[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. T
> For some reason, when I use the pass directive on my Linux box, the SET
> command comes across just fine. But when I try to set anything on the
> target, my app does not get called by the PASS directive. Get and GetNext
> work fine.
>
> Can you think of any reason the agen
First off, thanks to everyone for all the help so far!
I have a simple issue...or so it would seem
For some reason, when I use the pass directive on my Linux
box, the SET command comes across just fine. But when I try to set
anything on the target, my app does not get called
> Thanks for the info. I was afraid of that.
>
> Is there an easy place to hack this in?
> All I really need to do call my app once during the commit phase.
Well the simplest approach would be to edit
agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/pass.c
and adjust the routine setPass() to read
- i
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pass directive and Set Row
> I am planning on using the pass directive to create a shim
> between net-snmp and our already working snmp backend.
> I have a question about the set command.
Ah!
The most important thing to realise is that the "pass" mechan
> I am planning on using the pass directive to create a shim
> between net-snmp and our already working snmp backend.
> I have a question about the set command.
Ah!
The most important thing to realise is that the "pass" mechanism
is not reliable w.r.t. SET handling.
In par
I am planning on using the pass directive to create a shim
between net-snmp and our already working snmp backend.
I have a question about the set command.
From what I understand, if I want to set a row, there will
be one message to net-snmp.
Net-snmp will parse the message, and
> Is there any way to use one pass directive for multiple entries in a MIB?
> But what I would really like to do, is
>
> Pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.469.1000.2 myapp
>
> And have this process the original example by looking at the remaining
> .1.1.1 in the OID.
Yes - that's how
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:43:24 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BBC> Is there any way to use one pass directive for multiple entries in a MIB?
Yep.
BBC> But what I would really like to do, is
BBC>
BBC> Pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.469.1000.2 myapp
BBC>
BBC> And have this process the o
Is there any way to use one pass directive for multiple
entries in a MIB?
Right now I have it working with full OID info such as
Pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.469.1000.2.1.1.1 myapp
But what I would really like to do, is
Pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.469.1000.2 myapp
And have this process the
10 matches
Mail list logo