> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:34:56 +0530, Vinod Nanjaiah
> said:
VN> Is such a problem known to exist with snmpd?
VN> Or, does this indicate that something is wrong with the sub-agents?
Well, it's likely the connection between the master and the sub-agent
has failed. It actually could be ei
Hi,
I have observed the following problem with snmpd (net-snmp version 5.4.2).
I am running two sub-agents and snmpd on my system.
After a few days of running correctly, the sub-agents stop responding (to
snmpget requests).
On restarting snmpd only, the sub-agents start responding again.
Is
Thanks for ur help.
Sorry for not copying mailing list in previous email.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
>[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
> any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
> or inclination to offer private, un
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
2009/8/2
2009/8/21 shakeb ainul :
> I have a problem with snmpd daemon running on FreeBSD and Suse Linux
> servers. Ideally snmpd daemon should open just 1 port i.e 161 for udp but it
> is opening multiple ports on my machine. I have not configured it or used
> options to open multiple ports
Hi,
I have a problem with snmpd daemon running on FreeBSD and Suse Linux
servers. Ideally snmpd daemon should open just 1 port i.e 161 for udp but it
is opening multiple ports on my machine. I have not configured it or used
options to open multiple ports but still it is opening multiple udp ports
