On 25/10/06, Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> >> /* If you have openssl 0.9.7 or above, you likely have AES support. */
> >> -/* #undef USE_OPENSSL */
> >> +/* #undef NETSNMP_USE_OPENSSL */
> >>
> >> #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
> >
> > What about that last line of the contex
Dave Shield wrote:
>> /* If you have openssl 0.9.7 or above, you likely have AES support. */
>> -/* #undef USE_OPENSSL */
>> +/* #undef NETSNMP_USE_OPENSSL */
>>
>> #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
>
> What about that last line of the context? Should that have the NS
> prefix too?
Yes, it should. Thanks
On 25/10/06, Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When the Net-SNMP defines were changed to use the NETSNMP_ prefix, one
> was missed in win32/net-snmp-config.h which prevents applications from
> using SSL.
> /* If you have openssl 0.9.7 or above, you likely have AES support. */
> -/* #unde
Alex Burger wrote:
> When the Net-SNMP defines were changed to use the NETSNMP_ prefix, one
> was missed in win32/net-snmp-config.h which prevents applications from
> using SSL. I will apply the following patch to main.
+1
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-
When the Net-SNMP defines were changed to use the NETSNMP_ prefix, one
was missed in win32/net-snmp-config.h which prevents applications from
using SSL. I will apply the following patch to main.
Alex
Index: net-snmp-config.h
===