Re: sending both v1 and v2c traps

2009-09-04 Thread Dave Shield
2009/9/4 Scott Grumm : > I need to support a SNMP client that does not understand the SMIv2 > NOTIFICATION-TYPE. >  Should I create a separate MIB for that client that > uses TRAP-TYPE If this client cannot handle current standards, then yes. that's probably what you'll have to do. SMIv2 h

Re: sending both v1 and v2c traps

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Grumm
I need to support a SNMP client that does not understand the SMIv2 NOTIFICATION-TYPE.  I've loaded the MIB in and it does not recognize it as an event it can register but it does handle TRAP-TYPE.  I assumed that I was doing something wrong and needed to have MIBS with both the NOTIFICATION-TYP

Re: sending both v1 and v2c traps

2009-09-04 Thread Dave Shield
2009/9/4 Scott Grumm : > I am trying to send both v1 and v2c traps and am having problems figuring > out the right way to do it. > > Originally I thought that I should have two MIBs, one with a TRAP-TYPE > definition and one with a NOTIFICATION-TYPE definition. No. The version of SMI used to defin

sending both v1 and v2c traps

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Grumm
I am trying to send both v1 and v2c traps and am having problems figuring out the right way to do it. Originally I thought that I should have two MIBs, one with a TRAP-TYPE definition and one with a NOTIFICATION-TYPE definition.  I then made calls to send_trap_vars() and send_v2trap() figurin