On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:59:16PM +, Alexandre James wrote:
> Is this arrangement actually compliant? ie Is it perfectly valid for
> different contexts/communities to return different values for the
> same oids?
Cisco has been doing that for years with BRIDGE-MIB on their switches.
When VLAN
Shield
To: Alexandre James
Cc: Nguyen Dinh Phong ;
"[email protected]"
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: snmp in cluster
On 2 November 2011 15:59, Alexandre James wrote:
> Is this arrangement actually compliant? ie Is it perfectly valid
On 3 November 2011 23:05, Nguyen Dinh Phong wrote:
> Assuming I have AgentX tweak with all the contexts set up, can I do one
> snmpwalk at the main node for the whole cluster?
> snmpwalk -c public
> Or am I only be able to walk one node at a time with the right context for
> each node?
If you'r
On 2 November 2011 15:59, Alexandre James wrote:
> Is this arrangement actually compliant? ie Is it perfectly valid for different
> contexts/communities to return different values for the same oids?
It's certainly a valid use of contexts.
Indeed - this is the whole point of having contexts at all
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:24 AM
To: Nguyen Dinh Phong
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: snmp in cluster
On 2 November 2011 01:09, Nguyen Dinh Phong wrote:
> For example with the system mib:
> system.sysdescr.0 for th
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 2 November 2011 13:26, Fulko Hew wrote:
>> When I was forced to do this, I invented my own MIB that 'tableified' all of
>> the
>> information that I needed to aggregate across the 'cluster'.
>
>
>> So as the other response said, "you can't
On 2 November 2011 13:26, Fulko Hew wrote:
> When I was forced to do this, I invented my own MIB that 'tableified' all of
> the
> information that I needed to aggregate across the 'cluster'.
> So as the other response said, "you can't add indexes to an existing MIB",
> but I created my own MIB
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Nguyen Dinh Phong wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to set up a cluster of nodes running net-snmp5.3.3.2, with only one
> main node responsible for external requests. The requirement is to make the
> whole cluster appearing as one system to NMS applications. If a customer
> d
On 2 November 2011 01:09, Nguyen Dinh Phong wrote:
> For example with the system mib:
> system.sysdescr.0 for the main node
> system.sysdescr.[index1] for node 1
> system.sysdescr.[index2] for node2,
No - SNMP doesn't work like that.
sysDescr (note the capitalisation) is defined as a
Hi,
I'd like to set up a cluster of nodes running net-snmp5.3.3.2, with only one
main node responsible for external requests. The requirement is to make the
whole cluster appearing as one system to NMS applications. If a customer does a
snmpwalk at the main node, he would see all the OIDs for a
10 matches
Mail list logo
