Re: sysORTable rewrite

2008-03-28 Thread Dave Shield
On 27/03/2008, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another problem of this patch is that it fails to follow the rules set > out in 'MIB Module ReWrites' Note that the policy outlined in this Wiki page currently has no standing whatsoever. It's just something that I put together as my

Re: sysORTable rewrite

2008-03-27 Thread Thomas Anders
Magnus Fromreide wrote: > I have a rewrite of sysORTable that have the following advantages and > disadvantages: Without having done a full review yet, I must say I like what you did. I'd be fine with committing it to trunk. > Another problem of this patch is that it fails to follow the rules set

sysORTable rewrite

2008-03-27 Thread Magnus Fromreide
Hello. I have a rewrite of sysORTable that have the following advantages and disadvantages: Advantages: * Supports reregistering of sysORTable entries from subagents * Supports unregistering of sysORTable entries * Defines a public interface * Uses a container handler for