On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:47:25 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 22:20 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
DS> But it's subsequently proved impossible to use this as a straight
DS> replacement. So you're probably right, and we should drop the
DS> separate index_oid/index_oid_len fields.
OK, will d
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 22:20 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> turn-about is fair play, right? :-)
'Spose so.
> I was moving the notification_log mib stuff into the agent library
> today, and the cvs main version is based on table_dataset2.
Hmmm...
I must admit that I haven't done much with that part
Dave,
turn-about is fair play, right? :-)
I was moving the notification_log mib stuff into the agent library today, and
the cvs main version is based on table_dataset2. I've got 2 questions.
The data2 structure has the table container netsnmp_index and it's own
index_oid/index_oid_len (which is
