On 8/26/05, Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aakansha rajvi wrote:
> > I have net-snmp 5.2.1 configured in linux. I have my private MIBS also
> > and it also got configured in linux.
> >
> > I executed 'make distclean' to install the same package in windows.
> >
> > Now, I am trying to inst
Good norning to all ... poking aroung in the
sources... i have noticed the following declarations
#define LABEL 1
#define SUBTREE 2
#define SYNTAX 3
#define OBJID (4 | SYNTAX_MASK)
#define OCTETSTR(5 | SYNTAX_MASK)
#define INTEGER (6 | SYNTAX_MASK)
#define NETADDR (
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 15:19 -0500, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> I have these setup just like in the tutorial, but I am getting wierd
> results:
>
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 3597620
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 839
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 19131260
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:27:19AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > If we look at the code then in agentx/master.c there is the line
> >
> > sess.local_port = AGENTX_PORT;
> >
> > but if I look at netsnmp_tcp_create_tstring in snmplib/snmp
Dave Shield wrote:
> Ummm
> What exactly is wrong with these figures?
Check out the sample graph from the NET-SNMP tutorial:
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/tutorial/tutorial-4/mrtg/kontor.cpu.html
Compare that with 'My' user vs. idle:
http://cytrex.cytelcom.com/cgi-bin/14all.cgi?
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert Story wrote:
Yes, that's what I found too, but what we're looking for is something
like
libnetsnmp.so.5.2... It seems that a major/minot is possible, as it is
mentioned here in the debian packaging guide:
I do not know of a way to do this with li
I vote:
4) follow libtool versioning recommendations
(http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Versioning)
not because I actually know what I'm talking about, just because if a
standard is available I tend to follow it rather than re-inventing the
wheel. That being said, I've been kno
I second that.
-Igor
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Bruce Shaw wrote:
I vote:
4) follow libtool versioning recommendations
(http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Versioning)
not because I actually know what I'm talking about, just because if a
standard is available I tend to follow it ra
