Kyle Lussier wrote:
> Just a head's up that we are still having the issue in Net-SNMP 5.4. This
> is verified not to occur when the code is compiled in 32-bit, and we
> believe it's 64-bit specific (and occurs on AMD/Opteron) builds.
Can you put all this good info into a proper bug report on
http:
Hmmm
"net-snmp.org expired on 12/01/2006 and is pending renewal or deletion."
>> Just a head's up that we are still having the issue in Net-SNMP 5.4.
>> This
>> is verified not to occur when the code is compiled in 32-bit, and we
>> believe it's 64-bit specific (and occurs on AMD/Opteron)
> Can you put all this good info into a proper bug report on
> http://www.net-snmp.org/bugs, please?
The domain, I think has been expired, if you guys want me to pay to
renew it I can, but I need info to do so.
> Also, it may be worth looking through the compiler warnings for a 64-bit
> build. T
Kyle Lussier wrote:
>> Can you put all this good info into a proper bug report on
>> http://www.net-snmp.org/bugs, please?
>
> The domain, I think has been expired, if you guys want me to pay to
> renew it I can, but I need info to do so.
It has already been done. Caching aside, the net-snmp.org
Thanks - we are doing another round of testing with full symbolic info and
am going to try to trace it deeper before posting formal bug report so
it's more specific.
The last incidence that got traced deep into it seemed to show no pending
packet process requests inside the session. The packets
Please keep answers on the list!
On tor, 2006-12-07 at 06:59 +0100, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That's what i meant. The "agent" reffer to the net-snmp daemon. So Yes,
> the data are going to be held in the sub-agent.
In this context "the agent" is the program that contains the code t
I'm puzzled about the latest change to SNMP.pm:
http://net-snmp.cvs.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/net-snmp/perl/SNMP/SNMP.pm?r1=5.81&r2=5.82
Can this please be commented on? Given the versioning of the Perl modules in the
other branches (and the other Perl modules in the same branch), I'm not sure
abo
