Okay, so I've implemented a sub-agent using the pass_persist mechanism
in net-SNMP. Testing with snmpget, I can get the values expected.
Testing with snmpgetnext, I get the value of the "next" OID. Here's a
sample, slightly anonymized:
1004 $ snmpget -On -v 2c -c xxx dev1 1.3.6.1.4.1.59.1.5.
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du vendredi 16 mars
2012, vers 23:03, Charlie Martin disait :
> Okay, so I've implemented a sub-agent using the pass_persist mechanism
> in net-SNMP. Testing with snmpget, I can get the values expected.
> Testing with snmpgetnext, I get the
On 03/16/2012 04:52 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Use:
> snmpwalk -On -v 2c -c copan psmdev1 1.3.6.1.4.1.59.1.5.3.1.1
1020 $ snmpwalk -On -v 2c -c copan psmdev1 1.3.6.1.4.1.59.1.5.3.1.1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.59.1.5.3.1.1 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID
Which actually corresponds to the o
Hi,
I am using mib2c tool for generating template code. My doubt is which
configuration file should be used. I mean UCD-SNMP style or NET-SNMP style.
If we use NET-SNMP style, which configuration to be used for tables?
If possible can you please send me one modified code after generating from
mib
