Control: tags -1 + upstream patch
Hello!
The attached patch (in combination with the fix for #841554) makes the
Debian net-snmp package build against openssl 1.1.0. This patch has only
been compile-tested. No runtime testing. No guarantees. Please review
carefully.
(Additional ifdefs likely need
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:14:42 -0800 Bart wrote:
BVA> My Internet provider (Comcast) does not provide any addresses
BVA> for these two DNS names:
BVA>
BVA> $ dig +short twoa.net-snmp.org
BVA> $ dig +short onea.net-snmp.org
BVA> $ dig onea.net-snmp.org
BVA>
BVA> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4 <<>> onea.net-snm
On 11/08/16 05:24, Robert Story wrote:
> So as far as I can tell, the failure point is your router's DNS
> resolution.
Hello Robert,
From the status screen of my router:
DNS 1: 75.75.75.75
DNS 2: 75.75.76.76
The only addresses that are "misresolved by my router" are
onea.net-snmp.org and twoa.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 07:12:48 -0800 Bart wrote:
BVA> From the status screen of my router:
BVA> DNS 1: 75.75.75.75
BVA> DNS 2: 75.75.76.76
BVA>
BVA> The only addresses that are "misresolved by my router" are
BVA> onea.net-snmp.org and twoa.net-snmp.org. Since my router is
BVA> running a recent vers
Hello,
As requested in the sujbect, what's the purpose of line 2824 in mib.c file?
tmpbuf2[strlen(tmpbuf2)-1] = 0;
It causes my "/mibs" directory to be trimmed to "/mib" and nothing works.
Other static buffers are zero-terminated by using sizeof()hence preventing some
potential trouble but thi
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:35:46 + Moreno wrote:
MF> As requested in the sujbect, what's the purpose of line 2824 in mib.c file?
MF>
MF> tmpbuf2[strlen(tmpbuf2)-1] = 0;
MF>
MF> It causes my "/mibs" directory to be trimmed to "/mib" and nothing works.
Then it sounds like your mibindex file is not
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:39:01 +0100 Andreas wrote:
AH> Control: tags -1 + upstream patch
AH>
AH> Hello!
AH>
AH> The attached patch (in combination with the fix for #841554)
AH> makes the Debian net-snmp package build against openssl 1.1.0.
AH> This patch has only been compile-tested. No runtime tes
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:02:51 -0800 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 11/08/2016 12:17 PM, Robert Story wrote:
BVA> > Static buffers/arrays should be initialized before use. If
BVA> > you find any that are used before they are initialized,
BVA> > please file a bug and, if you can, submit a patch to fix
BVA> > them
On 11/08/16 13:15, Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:02:51 -0800 Bart wrote:
> BVA> On 11/08/2016 12:17 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> BVA> > Static buffers/arrays should be initialized before use. If
> BVA> > you find any that are used before they are initialized,
> BVA> > please file a bug a
On 11/08/16 08:03, Robert Story wrote:
> I've updated both records to use the documentation netblock. See if
> that works better for you.
Hello Robert,
T070com2sec_simple passes again on my development system.
Thanks!
Bart.
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
