Un-featureize register_const_config_handler, or mark it as required in snmp_enum.c?

2017-02-27 Thread Bill Fenner
snmp_enum.c has been (very reasonably) changed to use register_const_config_handler(). This confounds --with-minimalist, though, because snmp_enum.c doesn't require the feature. I see two ways forward here: 1. Make register_const_config_handler unconditional. It's used by snmp_enum.c and snmp_en

Re: Un-featureize register_const_config_handler, or mark it as required in snmp_enum.c?

2017-02-27 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Bill Fenner wrote: > snmp_enum.c has been (very reasonably) changed to > use register_const_config_handler(). This confounds --with-minimalist, > though, because snmp_enum.c doesn't require the feature. > > I see two ways forward here: > 1. Make register_

Re: Un-featureize register_const_config_handler, or mark it as required in snmp_enum.c?

2017-02-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 02/27/17 12:22, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Bill Fenner wrote: >> snmp_enum.c has been (very reasonably) changed to >> use register_const_config_handler(). This confounds --with-minimalist, >> though, because snmp_enum.c doesn't require the feature. >> >>