Hi,
here are my 0.02$
|
| We have decided to move our Net-SNMP development to GitHub after many
| wonderful years being hosted at SourceForge. We greatly appreciate
| SourceForge's support of open source projects over the years, but it's
| time we take advantage of some features of GitHub that
On 2018/05/10 16:14, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
> 6. downloads
>
> Github uses a different mechanism for distributing tarballs of
> downloads. But I don't see an issue with this in the future.
One thing to note with this that's not immediately obvious with github
downloa
Stuart Henderson writes:
|> One thing to note with this that's not immediately obvious with github
|> downloads, the automatically added "source code" links in github releases
|> are generated on-the-fly then cached, so they're subject to change if
|> they update software on nodes if the files ex
Josef Ridky writes:
Thanks so much for your opinions!
|> Is it possible to keep the mailing list still available (don't have to
|> be at SF, but have somewhere a mailing list)?
|> It is useful for general discussion and I think it is better than forums.
Well, as my badly written options didn't
On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 1:59 AM, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here are my 0.02$
>
> |
> | We have decided to move our Net-SNMP development to GitHub after many
> | wonderful years being hosted at SourceForge. We greatly appreciate
> | SourceForge's support of open source projects over the ye
Wes,
On Thu, May 10, 2018, at 4:12 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Keith Mendoza writes:
>
> > I would very much like to be part of the discussion regarding moving
> > to Github if its amenable to you guys.
>
> Sorry for the delay on this; I had a week and a half of constant special
> meetings that t
On Mon, May 7, 2018, at 15:08, Robert Story wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:44:59 -0500 Mark wrote:
> MF> The HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWInstalled support for FreeBSD pkg
> MF> stops working after so many queries and requires an snmpd
> MF> process restart. I have been observing this for quite some t
Missed from when support was added to recognise OpenBSD 6.0+ in 367c44eb60.
I couldn't see any file that Makefile.in is generated from, so just patching
it directly, hope that's right:
>From 47c3f2e69fc5f73dd9ca1ca1eeaca648f1bc3608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stuart Henderson
Date: Fri, 11 Ma
On 05/11/18 13:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Missed from when support was added to recognise OpenBSD 6.0+ in 367c44eb60.
I couldn't see any file that Makefile.in is generated from, so just patching
it directly, hope that's right:
From 47c3f2e69fc5f73dd9ca1ca1eeaca648f1bc3608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On 2018/05/11 13:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/11/18 13:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Missed from when support was added to recognise OpenBSD 6.0+ in 367c44eb60.
> > I couldn't see any file that Makefile.in is generated from, so just patching
> > it directly, hope that's right:
> >
> >
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
