Re: RFC: removal of the NETSNMP_DS_LIB_ALARM_DONT_USE_SIG feature

2009-12-21 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Bart Van Assche bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote: As known libnetsnmp supports time-based alarms via the functions snmp_alarm_register(), run_alarms() and other functions. Two different ways to trigger the function run_alarms() are supported inside libnetsnmp:

SNMPD problems

2009-12-21 Thread cowboylrc
Dear Dave we find that after make net-snmp ,the snmpd in agent/ is too big more then 5M. how should I make it become small ,better not over 1M we just need some basic Function . Thanks -- This SF.Net email is

Re: SNMPD problems

2009-12-21 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:42 +0800, cowboylrc wrote: Dear Dave Please address questions to the list- I am certain Dave is swamped enough without having to read messages twice. For me a direct mail is a big turn-off on the willingness to respond. we find that after make net-snmp ,the snmpd in

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[17926]

2009-12-21 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 12:01 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revision: 17926 http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17926view=rev Author: bvassche Date: 2009-12-21 12:01:15 + (Mon, 21 Dec 2009) Log Message: --- Applied patch #2912062:

strdup() in sprintf() in patch 1775124 = memory leak

2009-12-21 Thread lanas
All, Just to let you know that 5.4.1 as shipped by Debian applies a patch # 1775124 that contains two strdup() inside a sprintf() statement in the netsnmp_udp_fmtaddr() method (plus one more) See: http://pastebin.ca/1701854. I reckon that this was fixed later (5.5. does not have it).

Re: strdup() in sprintf() in patch 1775124 = memory leak

2009-12-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:18:54 -0500 lanas la...@securenet.net wrote: All, Just to let you know that 5.4.1 as shipped by Debian applies a patch # 1775124 that contains two strdup() inside a sprintf() statement in the netsnmp_udp_fmtaddr() method (plus one more) See: