On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
We actually need two votes now per patch now:
- 5.5.1 (now in pre1)
+1(though I'd be tempted to set the two lengths
at the start of the loop, rather than the end)
- 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
Hmm this
Thanks Wes. Ignore my last query on netsnmp_table_helper_add_indexes().
I found where I did make the mistake.
From: sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com
To: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net;
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
- 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
Hmm this isn't really a show-stopper, so strictly speaking
shouldn't be applied.
It's somehow a
The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
persistent file.
This patch fixes it (and removes some identity casts). The crucial
point is setting the viewMaskLen before calling read_octet_string.
Index: snmplib/vacm.c
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:28:56 + Dave wrote:
DS On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
DS We actually need two votes now per patch now:
DS
DS - 5.5.1 (now in pre1)
DS
DS +1(though I'd be tempted to set the two lengths
DS at the start of
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:55:14 +0100 Niels wrote:
NB The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
NB persistent file.
NB
NB This patch fixes it (and removes some identity casts). The crucial
NB point is setting the viewMaskLen before calling read_octet_string.
+1
On 22 December 2010 16:13, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
DS - 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
DS
DS Hmm this isn't really a show-stopper, so strictly speaking
DS shouldn't be applied.
I dunno... I think broken AgentX processing is a pretty big deal.
But remember the definition of show
On 22 December 2010 14:55, Niels Baggesen n...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
persistent file.
5.5.1: +1
5.6.1: +1 iff rc2 scheduled
-1 otherwise
Dave
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:55:49 +, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk said:
DS Unless I've missed something, the effects of this particular problem
DS don't match any of these three cases. (I believe it results in wrong
DS or missing information - though I haven't been paying much
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:34:44 -0500, Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com said:
BF It's somehow a regression against net-snmp 5.5, so IMO it is more
BF important for 5.6. I can't explain what is different in 5.5 that it
BF worked with the same code, but it did.
I suspect luck was involved. I suspect
On 22 December 2010 21:51, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
DS Maybe we need to review our definitions of show stopper at
DS next month's admin meeting.
Probably a worthy discussion.
I've added this to the agenda.
(Having first created an agenda to add it to :-))
Dave
5.6.1.rc2: 12/28
5.6.1: 1/4
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database
12 matches
Mail list logo
