How can using an explicitly sized int32_t expose more archetectual
differences than using an archetecturely dependent long?
Brad
On Jul 23, 2011 11:43 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ilya Yanok ya...@emcraft.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 19.07.2011
Currently we are building net-snmp version 5.4.2.1 / 12.fc11. We had numerous
patches we had downloaded to apply as well as a few of our own.
Now we are moving to centos 6 which has version 5.5 / 27.el6_0.1. We've
noticed some of the 5.4.2.1 patches are applied to the source code and some
I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
normal build environment
which includes the host mib, and discovered that it was building with an
hrh_storage module.
So I started looking at the host mib. A walk of the mib produced (
actually didn't produce )
the FixedDisk
I have app 100 HPUX 11.23 servers running iexpress net snmp
App 25 of them have errors with snmpwalk as follows
./snmpwalk -c sa1nt wpsscc00
Timeout: No Response from wpsscc00
All others are working fine
Can you tell me what to look for in diagnosing this problem?
Best Regards
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW I'm assuming that sizeof(int32_t) == sizeof(int) on all
architectures until proven otherwise:
There has been a time that sizeof(int) == 2 for most compilers. Net-SNMP
development started back then.
Bart.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Rudd, Michael michael.r...@tekelec.comwrote:
Currently we are building net-snmp version 5.4.2.1 / 12.fc11. We had
numerous patches we had downloaded to apply as well as a few of our own. *
***
** **
Now we are moving to centos 6 which has version 5.5 /
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:18:26 +0400 Ilya wrote:
IY Why do we use long to store 32bit integers? Shouldn't we change it to be
IY int32_t? At very least we should make it 'transparent' to the MIB code:
IY it should be possible to register watched ASN_INTEGER instance with 4
IY bytes size and this
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:00:20PM -0700, Dennis Andrews wrote:
I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
normal build environment
What OS?
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight, not
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:26:58 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK while working on my UBUNTU linux system with net-snmp V5.7 I missed most
CK of the IPv6 configuration at the MIBII if, ip, and route-tables.
CK So I tested the the net-snmp V5.6 with the same configuration and it
CK works fine!
Can you check
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:45:29 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK When I use a snmpcmd as non root I get always errors about MIB loading.
CK
CK How can I prevent this?
CK What has been changed with V5.7 about mib index handling?
It's a bug.. Here's a temporary patch that can be applied to the source...
Thanks, that helps!
A note about the general Mib index handling:
The default is to create the MIB index at the persistentDir.
But the default is owned by root and readonly, or sometime as on my
macbook, not readable for users.
So IMHO at leased the persistendDir should be configured at users
Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:00:20PM -0700, Dennis Andrews wrote:
I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
normal build environment
What OS?
Based on the post, I'd say RHEL6.
+Thomas
12 matches
Mail list logo
