Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:49:29 +0200, Niels Baggesen > said: NB> You're welcom to do it. If I shall do it, it won't be until sometime NB> next week, and then I may have forgotten :-) Thanks, done! -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ---

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-15 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 04:00:47PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:42:12 +0200, Niels Baggesen > > said: > > NB> I'm not that much for numeric OID's, but I have this script > > Can I (or you) post that helpful script to our wiki? You're welcom to do it. If I shall

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-14 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:36:50 -0400, Bill Fenner said: BF> I started down this path, then decided to rewrite it from scratch, since the BF> implementation is so poor. (There were many points that fed into this BF> decision, but the primary one was that it would block the rest of the agent BF

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-14 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:42:12 +0200, Niels Baggesen > said: NB> I'm not that much for numeric OID's, but I have this script Can I (or you) post that helpful script to our wiki? -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ---

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-14 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 14-09-2011 00:57, Doug Manley skrev: > If you have gotten this working, I would appreciate any configuration > files, version numbers, etc.--anything that can get me on my way. Just to make sure I downloaded the 5.7 release tar file from the homepage to my CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system, and config

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-13 Thread Doug Manley
NB> What version of Net-SNMP is this? NB> Are you sure that you have configured the "private" community to allow snmpset? I have confirmed this on net-snmp 5.4.3 (gentoo), 5.4.3 (ubuntu), and 5.7 (source). My community string is set up as: rwcommunity private You can see that it is used in the "s

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-13 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 03:08:33PM -0400, Doug Manley wrote: > It can do an snmpget on sysDescr.0 just fine with the "private" > rwcommunity string, but anything after that [in relation to > DISMAN-PING-MIB] doesn't work. What version of Net-SNMP is this? Are you sure that you have configured the

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-07 Thread Bill Fenner
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Doug Manley wrote: > NB> I'm not that much for numeric OID's, but I have this script > > I took the script and added a little bit of "-x" fun so that you can > see what it's doing and where it's getting the errors. > > It can do an snmpget on sysDescr.0 just fine w

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-02 Thread Doug Manley
NB> I'm not that much for numeric OID's, but I have this script I took the script and added a little bit of "-x" fun so that you can see what it's doing and where it's getting the errors. It can do an snmpget on sysDescr.0 just fine with the "private" rwcommunity string, but anything after that [

Re: Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-01 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:24:43PM -0400, Doug Manley wrote: > Has anyone made snmpd perform remote pings recently via "snmpset"? I'm not that much for numeric OID's, but I have this script === #!/bin/bash WHERE=$1 KIND=$2 WHAT=$3 INX='"nba"."A"' CRED

Getting snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests

2011-09-01 Thread Doug Manley
I have recently tried to get snmpd to respond to DISMAN-PING-MIB requests in an attempt to confirm how net-snmp implements the MIB (since I believe that certain D-Link switches utilize net-snmp). According to this "article," support is present but (1) limited and (2) flat-wrong in places: http://ww