On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:43:56 -0500, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com
said:
BF (I've already diffed agent/mibgroup/agentx between 5.5 and 5.6, it's
BF almost all cleanups that can't explain this; there's
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:43:56 -0500, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com
said:
BF (I've already diffed agent/mibgroup/agentx between 5.5 and 5.6, it's
BF almost all cleanups that can't explain this; there's something more
BF subtle going on somewhere.)
RS Have you diffed the transport code too?
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:42:09 -0500 Bill wrote:
BF (I've already diffed agent/mibgroup/agentx between 5.5 and 5.6, it's
BF almost all cleanups that can't explain this; there's something more
BF subtle going on somewhere.)
Have you diffed the transport code too?
Hi,
Our system uses Net-SNMP on both ends of the AgentX master/subagent
relationship. With Net-SNMP 5.5, everything was very stable. With
Net-SNMP 5.6, the subagent occasionally reconnects after a period of
not being able to serve its objects.
The subagent tracing looks like it stops getting
