On 2 January 2011 09:44, sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Issue I am facing is an implementation issue.
While refreshing the data or loading for the first time , Do I have to load
the whole tree data to all the tables ?
As you say, this is an implementation issue.
That means
From: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
To: sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com
Cc: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net;
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table
-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 2:46:33 PM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
From: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
To: sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com
Cc: Wes Hardaker harda
From: Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
To: sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tue, December 21, 2010 6:11:08 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:43:26
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com said:
sp Thanks Wes. That's right . I have got it now and able to progress . I was
sp confused whether to make tree structure .
Tree structures are not supported by SMIv2 (the MIB language). If
you're getting
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:43:26 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com said:
sp I have implemented simple table quite a few times . But I am confused to
sp implement when the mib contain more than one table and the tables are
sp nested(means the second table data repeats for
I have implemented simple table quite a few times . But I am confused to
implement when the mib contain more than one table and the tables are
nested(means the second table data repeats for each row of first table data,
which I think is very common).
I am using mib2c.iterate.conf to
