Dave If it's due to the change in the handling of forking off sub-processes,
Dave then it will have been broken since 5.1 - i.e. for almost a year.
Dave If it's taken that long to come to light, then I don't really think
Dave this counts as a show stopper.
Robert I consider any segfault or
Hello,
I have a couple of questions:
1) I want the snmpd executable to be self-contained and not dependant on
installation of net-snmp. Is this possible.
The snmpd excutable resides in nets-snmp5.1.2/agent/.libs and when excuted
when net-snmp has been installed
everything is starts correctly.
Hello,
Sorry for the delay in the answer to the mail.
6. the thing is I'm trying to create both authentication and encription
of
the snmpv3 messages.
snmpusm -v 3 -u initial -n -l authPriv -a MD5 -A setup_passphrase
-x
DES -X setup_passphrase -l authPriv localhost create redtest1
I'm trying to see if Bug 1016849
(https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=112694aid=1016849group_id=12694)
is still in 5.2. I've installed 45.2.rc1 and I'm having unrelated problems which are
preventing me from validating the bug.
My /usr/share/snmp/snmpd.conf (which works with
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:04:27 -0500 Gary wrote:
GC 1) I want the snmpd executable to be self-contained and not dependant on
GC installation of net-snmp. Is this possible.
Yes. Try the static linking tips here:
http://www.net-snmp.org/faqs/rstory/#static
GC 2) The snmpd.conf file is
Much appreciated that looks like its doing the job. Very nice.
Cheers,
Garyc
- Original Message -
From: Robert Story (Users) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gary Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Packaging of snmpd
On Mon, 25 Oct
Hi All,
I'm working for a vendor who is using net-snmp 5.0.7. They are
concerned about the vulnerability outlined in CAN-2003-0935.
Unfortunately, this vendor has made significant modifications to the
agent, and they are uncomfortable with the prospect of upgrading to
5.0.9 or newer software
