Ugh...
$ grep -ir TCPTV_MIN /usr/include/*
/usr/include/netinet/tcp_timer.h:#defineTCPTV_MIN (
1*PR_SLOWHZ) /* minimum allowable value */
$ uname -a
NetBSD deadset 2.99.9 NetBSD 2.99.9 (DEADSET) #4: Sun Nov 7 21:21:25
EST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/disk0/obj/sys/arch/i38
README.solaris should lay it out fairly cleanly.
gcc is a perfectly good compiler
most of the information you want is in HOST-RESOURCES-MIB
>We are running Sun Sparc enterprise class servers with solaris 9.
>Trying to learn how to get snmp traps to collect information such as cpu
utilzation (
Hello,
I have downloaded the latest release for Windows but i am having
some problems. This is the first time i try net-smnp.
With the windows snmp service i am able to send requests to mibs
with AdventNet MibBrowser, but with the service provided by
net-smnp i am unable to do it. AdventNet gives
make errors on Tiger 10.4.2
mibII/tcp.c: In function `tcp_handler':
mibII/tcp.c:318: error: `TCPTV_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function)
mibII/tcp.c:318: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mibII/tcp.c:318: error: for each function it appears in.)
mibII/tcp.c:326: erro
Good Day
We are running Sun Sparc enterprise class servers with solaris 9.
Trying to learn how to get snmp traps to collect information such as cpu utilzation (ie. system,user, process), disk utilization, failed login attempts, etc. going to a linux OpenNMS manager.
The sun mib does not report
Ali Al-Shabibi wrote:
Oh, yes it will. It still takes CPU cycles to process the information and
generate the necessary SNMP packets. If you're hammering the CPU once every
millisecond to do this, it isn't going to have much time for anything else.
Sorry but packet forwarding is done in
>Oh, yes it will. It still takes CPU cycles to process the information and
>generate the necessary SNMP packets. If you're hammering the CPU once every
>millisecond to do this, it isn't going to have much time for anything else.
Sorry but packet forwarding is done in hardware , basically durin
>This is not a problem in our case, seeing as we have two separate
>networks. One for data and one for control (management). So what we
>monitor will not be afected.
Oh, yes it will. It still takes CPU cycles to process the information and
generate the necessary SNMP packets. If you're hammering
> No more granularity than 1 second.
Hmm well thats no good for me...
>
> Note: bear in mind that the more you monitor something, the more your
> monitoring affects it. If you monitor too frequently, it is quite
> possible that you will impact the device's performance.
This is not a problem i
Name resolution appears to have been the issue. The -n option fixed this.
Thanks,
Tim
>To rule out name resolution, add "-n" to the command-line and try again.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
Timothy Tierney wrote:
>> I am running net-snmp snmptrapd Version 5.1.3
Hey guys,
I'm trying to graph my cpu usage according to the following tutorial:
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/tutorial/tutorial-4/mrtg/
I have these setup just like in the tutorial, but I am getting wierd
results:
UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 3597620
UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know which version can used dlmod at powerpc with ELDK
3.1.1?
I'v try5.0.6,5.0.7,5.0.8,5.0.9, but these version net-snmp all got
compiler error, only 5.1.3.1 can compiler ok but it still not enable
dlmod by --enable-share.
Did you used specify --with-mib-
Hi All:
Anybody know which version can used dlmod at powerpc with ELDK
3.1.1?
I'v try5.0.6,5.0.7,5.0.8,5.0.9, but these version net-snmp all got
compiler error, only 5.1.3.1 can compiler ok but it still not enable
dlmod by --enable-share.
I know ELDK 3.1.1 has include net-snmp 5.0.6 and it
13 matches
Mail list logo
