Is there any way to avoid compiling Trapreceiver directory by disabling any
module?
as i'm not using any traps. I just want to bypass the compilation, Please
let me know if there
is any alternative way. I couldnot proceed any further with this
compilation.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Group w
> From: Fulko Hew [mailto:fulko@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:29 AM
> MIB definition
> --
>
> In the case of MIB definition, we want to discriminate between SMIv1
> and SMIv2.
No, we distinguish (and the agent discriminates) SNMPv1 traps (which
are noti
On 29 January 2010 19:28, Fulko Hew wrote:
> In the case of MIB definition, we want to discriminate between SMIv1 and
> SMIv2.
When defining a new MIB file, you should write it using SMIv2.
The older form is effectively obsolete (unless you have ancient
software that only understands SMIv1).
The
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 28 January 2010 16:31, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > But nsNotifyShutdown is defined as { netSnmpNotifications 2 } which works
> > out to be (in my books):
> >
> > ... netsnmp (8072).netSnmpNotificationPrefix(4).netSnmpNotifications(0)
> >
> > I ne
> From: Vivek Singh Bhadauria [mailto:viv_...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:11 PM
> My system shows these two host/hr_swrun, host/hr_swinst on executing
> the command shared by you.
>
> I think this is the issue with the Linux Gentoo system which has emerge
> not the RPM.
>
>
Hi Dave,
As in case of net-snmp EngineId generated based on random
number and current time.
Hence every time system will reboot both the above DATA will change.
Hence EngineId will change ?
Am I right ?
/*
* Here we've desigend our own ENGINEID that i
On 29 January 2010 11:26, sanjaykumar wrote:
> As in case of net-snmp EngineId generated based on random number
> and current time.
> Hence every time system will reboot both the above DATA will change.
Right.
> Hence EngineId will change ?
No.
The engine ID is calculated when the a
On 29 January 2010 09:14, nampindo ceaser wrote:
> dear members
>
> Am trying to do a project making snmp more secure using kerberos protocol.
> Is any one who has ever tried it or who has an idea about it?
> Any help rendered will helpful
Have a look at the "ksm" security model:
configure -
On 29 January 2010 06:22, sanjaykumar wrote:
> Now as every time device reboot EngineID is Changing, Hence the engine
> Time reset to "zero[0]" and Engine Boot to "1".
> Does it correct that EngineID should also Change ?
> Or it should change only in case of Power OFF ?
The engine ID uniquel
On 29 January 2010 00:03, wrote:
> I use the following line to configure in QNX:
> ./configure --enable-mini-agent --with-defaults
> --with-out-transports="Callback Unix" --with-transports="UDP"
> --with-out-transports="TCP"
> --with-out-mib-modules="agent/mibII/vacm_config"
Delete this line.
"e
You need some modifies. I installed net-snmp under default settings
Put the config file /usr/local/share/snmp/
use /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -C -c /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf -M
/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs/ via CLI start your snmpd routine
-- Original --
Hi,
This is ganesh.
i am facing problems in configuring netsnmp agnet.
i am getting time out error and no response from local host kind of errors.
Could you tell me how to configure agent to comeout from this problem.
Would you send a copy of agent configuaration file?
thank you
With regard
12 matches
Mail list logo
