Hi,
After a bit of investigaton, the Getnext and bulkget calls go to the next
table, by adding a dummy colum entry with the below function call.
/*/
case COLUMN_TABLENOOP:
Hi Dave,
I made the host to network order suggestion, and now it works for Get, GetNext
and BulkGet calls.
However iam facing a issues with Getnext/Bulk/Snmpwalk get calls going to the
next table, the bulk/walk requests are NOT going to next table, it traverses to
the beginning of the same
On 26 August 2010 06:27, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Could you get a chance to look into this.
I've managed to reproduce the problem, yes.
(Once I'd stripped out all of the remaining
C++ stuff from your example code!)
Unfortunately I've only got one day before I leave
for a week's
Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely high priority
to get this issue resolved.
Any help in this is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anup
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent:
On 26 August 2010 12:10, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely
high priority to get this issue resolved.
Any help in this is highly appreciated.
If you want a quick-n-dirty hack to get things working,
you could always tweak the
Hi Dave,
I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works. The below is
the response.
Dev6-MgmtServer:/usr/sbin # snmpget -v 2c -c public 127.0.0.1
1.3.6.1.4.1.1139.21.2.2.5.1.1.128.221.252.35
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.1139.21.2.2.5.1.1.128.221.252.35 = No Such Instance
On 25 August 2010 07:21, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works
The code snipprt is as below::
Hmmm...
I'm not quite sure what is happening here.
Could you please post (as attachments) the *complete* code
of the MIB module that you
Attached is the code..
Thanks for your help.
~Anup
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:50 PM
To: Shankar, Anup
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fails::
On 25 August 2010 08:30, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Attached is the code..
And the header files?
What I'm looking to do is to try out your MIB module
on my local system, so I can see exactly what is going
wrong. In order to do that, I need *ALL* the stuff that
you have added (including the
Attached is the compiled code...
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:20 PM
To: Shankar, Anup
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and
Hi Dave,
Could you get a chance to look into this.
Thanks,
Anup
-Original Message-
From: Shankar, Anup
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:45 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in
Hi All,
We are using NET-SNMP code for building an SNMP agent for servicing our MIB
file. The MIB file reports performance metrics for the hardware. The Table
entries in the MIB use IP Address as index.
The setup is as below:
-
NET-SNMP : net-snmp-5.3.0.1-25.25
OS:
On 24 August 2010 13:48, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
snmp_set_var_typed_integer( idx, ASN_IPADDRESS,
ntohl(entry-vplexDirectorPrimaryIpAddr) );
The SMI type IpAddress is not an integer-based type.
It is a (four-octet) binary string, which holds the address
in network-byte order.
13 matches
Mail list logo
