On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:59:02 -0500 Jeff wrote:
JO Another issue is that some
JO ifTypes are not being identified correctly. I have identifed
JO the part of the code (the MFD version) where that is an issue
JO and hope to put together a patch in the next week or so.
Great! We love patches. ;-)
--
...
As far as future compatibility goes, getting the kernel to
recognize your
interfaces is the best option. If that's not possible, then you'll
have to
maintain proprietary patches against net-snmp.
Robert, I know you're the expert here but I've got non-standard Interfaces
working
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:47:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CRC ...
CRC As far as future compatibility goes, getting the kernel to
CRC recognize your interfaces is the best option. If that's not possible,
CRC then you'll have to maintain proprietary patches against net-snmp.
CRC
CRC Robert,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:47:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CRC ...
CRC As far as future compatibility goes, getting the kernel to
CRC recognize your interfaces is the best option. If that's not
possible,CRC then you'll have to maintain proprietary patches
against net-snmp.
CRC
CRC
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:16:54 -0500 Jeff wrote:
JO I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
JO standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting part
JO or all of the information. From looking at the code, it appears that I
JO willneed to directly
Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for. I agree
that getting the kernel to report the interfaces correctly
is the ideal approach. That will be my prefered approach,
but not being familiar with that part of the system, I like
having alternative approaches. Another issue is that some
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:41:18 -0500 Jeff wrote:
JO I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
JO standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting part or
JO all of the information.
Net-snmp gets the interface information from the kernel. If your embedded
Hello,
I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting part or
all of the information. From looking at the code, it appears that I will
need to directly modify the source that comes with net-snmp. This will leave
me
I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting
part or
all of the information. From looking at the code, it appears that I
willneed to directly modify the source that comes with net-snmp.
...
You can tell
I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting
part or
all of the information. From looking at the code, it appears that I
willneed to directly modify the source that comes with net-snmp.
...
You can
I have an embedded Linux system with some interfaces that are not
standard, i.e. the default ifTable implementation isn't getting
part or
all of the information. From looking at the code, it appears
that I
willneed to directly modify the source that comes with net-snmp.
...
11 matches
Mail list logo
