I'm hoping someone can tell me if I'm out of my mind or confirm my
suspicions. I'm using NetSNMP 5.1.2 (RPM on RHEL v.3). It seems
getnext() isn't properly ripping the index from the OID when it returns
with an object.
I'm working with a Cisco proprietary MIB (CISCO-PORT-SECURITY-MIB). I
am concentrating on the cpsSecureMacAddressTable table. The index for
this table is ifIndex.cpsSecureMacAddress. I'm trying to perform a
getnext() on the table entry
cpsSecureMacAddressTable.cpsSecureMacAddressEntry.cpsSecureMacAddrType
which is at OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.315.1.2.2.1.2. If we assume there
exists an ifIndex 99 and a MAC address 0.1.2.3.4.5 then I would expect a
getnext() on the given OID to return:
OID = .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.315.1.2.2.1.2 , iid = 99.0.1.2.3.4.5
but what I get back is:
OID = .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.315.1.2.2.1.2.99.0.1.2.3.4 , iid = 5
which I don't quite agree with. Shouldn't getnext() return an iid of
99.0.1.2.3.4.5 in this example? Have I missed something in the
documentation? A search of the bug database didn't show anything.
(I've used tkmib to view this table ... so I know the hardware is
returning useful information that tkmib can handle.)
Shane
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
