Hi,

I was using net-snmp 5.6.2 and have built the code and installed it.

I was using valgrind over snmptrap command.
Following is the command I ran.

valgrind --leak-check=full --log-file=log_snmptrap snmptrap -v 2c -c public
"" localhost UCD-TRAP-TEST-MIB::demoTrap


Following is the valgrind logging

==20969== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==20969== Copyright (C) 2002-2010, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==20969== Using Valgrind-3.6.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==20969== Command: snmptrap -v 2c -c public  localhost
UCD-TRAP-TEST-MIB::demoTrap
==20969== Parent PID: 2080
==20969==
==20969== Invalid read of size 8
==20969==    at 0x35B0E84F66: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F6EB: read_config_find_handler (read_config.c:504)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F717: run_config_handler (read_config.c:520)
==20969==    by 0x4C5FE74: read_config (read_config.c:934)
==20969==    by 0x4C60A98: read_config_files_in_path (read_config.c:1277)
==20969==    by 0x4C60E7B: read_config_files_of_type (read_config.c:1365)
==20969==    by 0x4C60ED2: read_config_files (read_config.c:1401)
==20969==    by 0x4C6146E: read_premib_configs (read_config.c:1045)
==20969==    by 0x4C43C92: init_snmp (snmp_api.c:848)
==20969==    by 0x4C58F86: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:641)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==  Address 0x4f01c18 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 10 alloc'd
==20969==    at 0x4A05236: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==20969==    by 0x35B0E81081: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C61D17: internal_register_config_handler
(read_config.c:229)
==20969==    by 0x4C61B4A: internal_register_config_handler
(read_config.c:185)
==20969==    by 0x4C73E1B: netsnmp_register_service_handlers
(snmp_service.c:407)
==20969==    by 0x4C43C6E: init_snmp (snmp_api.c:791)
==20969==    by 0x4C58F86: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:641)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==20969==    at 0x35B0E84FCB: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F6EB: read_config_find_handler (read_config.c:504)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F717: run_config_handler (read_config.c:520)
==20969==    by 0x4C5FE74: read_config (read_config.c:934)
==20969==    by 0x4C60A98: read_config_files_in_path (read_config.c:1277)
==20969==    by 0x4C60E7B: read_config_files_of_type (read_config.c:1365)
==20969==    by 0x4C60ED2: read_config_files (read_config.c:1401)
==20969==    by 0x4C6146E: read_premib_configs (read_config.c:1045)
==20969==    by 0x4C43C92: init_snmp (snmp_api.c:848)
==20969==    by 0x4C58F86: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:641)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==20969==    at 0x35B0E87104: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F6EB: read_config_find_handler (read_config.c:504)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F717: run_config_handler (read_config.c:520)
==20969==    by 0x4C5FE74: read_config (read_config.c:934)
==20969==    by 0x4C60A98: read_config_files_in_path (read_config.c:1277)
==20969==    by 0x4C60E7B: read_config_files_of_type (read_config.c:1365)
==20969==    by 0x4C60ED2: read_config_files (read_config.c:1401)
==20969==    by 0x4C6146E: read_premib_configs (read_config.c:1045)
==20969==    by 0x4C43C92: init_snmp (snmp_api.c:848)
==20969==    by 0x4C58F86: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:641)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==20969==    at 0x35B0E87108: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F6EB: read_config_find_handler (read_config.c:504)
==20969==    by 0x4C5F717: run_config_handler (read_config.c:520)
==20969==    by 0x4C5FE74: read_config (read_config.c:934)
==20969==    by 0x4C60A98: read_config_files_in_path (read_config.c:1277)
==20969==    by 0x4C60E7B: read_config_files_of_type (read_config.c:1365)
==20969==    by 0x4C60ED2: read_config_files (read_config.c:1401)
==20969==    by 0x4C6146E: read_premib_configs (read_config.c:1045)
==20969==    by 0x4C43C92: init_snmp (snmp_api.c:848)
==20969==    by 0x4C58F86: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:641)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969== Invalid read of size 8
==20969==    at 0x35B0E84F5D: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C7501D: find_tdomain (snmp_transport.c:427)
==20969==    by 0x4C753AE: netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full
(snmp_transport.c:613)
==20969==    by 0x401323: main (snmptrap.c:218)
==20969==  Address 0x4ef8d50 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
==20969==    at 0x4A05236: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==20969==    by 0x35B0E81081: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C7421A: create_word_array_helper (snmp_service.c:15)
==20969==    by 0x4C742B9: create_word_array (snmp_service.c:31)
==20969==    by 0x4C745A9: netsnmp_register_default_domain
(snmp_service.c:87)
==20969==    by 0x4C43218: _init_snmp (snmp_api.c:694)
==20969==    by 0x4C433B8: snmp_sess_init (snmp_api.c:730)
==20969==    by 0x4C581E4: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:210)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969== Invalid read of size 8
==20969==    at 0x35B0E84F66: __GI___strcasecmp_l (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C7501D: find_tdomain (snmp_transport.c:427)
==20969==    by 0x4C753AE: netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full
(snmp_transport.c:613)
==20969==    by 0x401323: main (snmptrap.c:218)
==20969==  Address 0x4ef8d58 is 4 bytes after a block of size 4 alloc'd
==20969==    at 0x4A05236: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==20969==    by 0x35B0E81081: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==20969==    by 0x4C7421A: create_word_array_helper (snmp_service.c:15)
==20969==    by 0x4C742B9: create_word_array (snmp_service.c:31)
==20969==    by 0x4C745A9: netsnmp_register_default_domain
(snmp_service.c:87)
==20969==    by 0x4C43218: _init_snmp (snmp_api.c:694)
==20969==    by 0x4C433B8: snmp_sess_init (snmp_api.c:730)
==20969==    by 0x4C581E4: netsnmp_parse_args (snmp_parse_args.c:210)
==20969==    by 0x4012A1: main (snmptrap.c:147)
==20969==
==20969==
==20969== HEAP SUMMARY:
==20969==     in use at exit: 42 bytes in 3 blocks
==20969==   total heap usage: 19,431 allocs, 19,428 frees, 1,140,080 bytes
allocated
==20969==
*==20969== 17 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 3*
*==20969==    at 0x4A05236: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)*
*==20969==    by 0x4C66C51: snmpv3_generate_engineID (snmpv3.c:1563)*
*==20969==    by 0x401652: main (snmptrap.c:175)*
*==20969== *
*==20969== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 3*
*==20969==    at 0x4A05236: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)*
*==20969==    by 0x40122D: main (snmptrap.c:143)*
==20969==
==20969== LEAK SUMMARY:
*==20969==    definitely lost: 35 bytes in 2 blocks*
==20969==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20969==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20969==    still reachable: 7 bytes in 1 blocks
==20969==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20969== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not
shown.
==20969== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
==20969==
==20969== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==20969== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come
from
==20969== ERROR SUMMARY: 100 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 4 from


I came to know highlighted memory leaks.

Is any patch available for the same?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to