RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-09-12 Thread anup.shankar
Hi, After a bit of investigaton, the Getnext and bulkget calls go to the next table, by adding a dummy colum entry with the below function call. /*/ case COLUMN_TABLENOOP:

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-09-10 Thread anup.shankar
Hi Dave, I made the host to network order suggestion, and now it works for Get, GetNext and BulkGet calls. However iam facing a issues with Getnext/Bulk/Snmpwalk get calls going to the next table, the bulk/walk requests are NOT going to next table, it traverses to the beginning of the same

Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-26 Thread Dave Shield
On 26 August 2010 06:27, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote: Could you get a chance to look into this. I've managed to reproduce the problem, yes. (Once I'd stripped out all of the remaining C++ stuff from your example code!) Unfortunately I've only got one day before I leave for a week's

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-26 Thread anup.shankar
Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely high priority to get this issue resolved. Any help in this is highly appreciated. Thanks, Anup -Original Message- From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent:

Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-26 Thread Dave Shield
On 26 August 2010 12:10, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote: Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely high priority to get this issue resolved. Any help in this is highly appreciated. If you want a quick-n-dirty hack to get things working, you could always tweak the

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread anup.shankar
Hi Dave, I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works. The below is the response. Dev6-MgmtServer:/usr/sbin # snmpget -v 2c -c public 127.0.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.1139.21.2.2.5.1.1.128.221.252.35 SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.1139.21.2.2.5.1.1.128.221.252.35 = No Such Instance

Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread Dave Shield
On 25 August 2010 07:21, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote: I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works The code snipprt is as below:: Hmmm... I'm not quite sure what is happening here. Could you please post (as attachments) the *complete* code of the MIB module that you

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread anup.shankar
Attached is the code.. Thanks for your help. ~Anup -Original Message- From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:50 PM To: Shankar, Anup Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Fails::

Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread Dave Shield
On 25 August 2010 08:30, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote: Attached is the code.. And the header files? What I'm looking to do is to try out your MIB module on my local system, so I can see exactly what is going wrong. In order to do that, I need *ALL* the stuff that you have added (including the

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread anup.shankar
Attached is the compiled code... -Original Message- From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:20 PM To: Shankar, Anup Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and

RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-25 Thread anup.shankar
Hi Dave, Could you get a chance to look into this. Thanks, Anup -Original Message- From: Shankar, Anup Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:45 PM To: 'Dave Shield' Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in

Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed in the request.

2010-08-24 Thread Dave Shield
On 24 August 2010 13:48, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:        snmp_set_var_typed_integer( idx, ASN_IPADDRESS, ntohl(entry-vplexDirectorPrimaryIpAddr) ); The SMI type IpAddress is not an integer-based type. It is a (four-octet) binary string, which holds the address in network-byte order.