On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Eduardo Bragatto
wrote:
> Your point is valid, but I always had the impression that the iid always
> comes down to the last numeric value in the complete OID. That way, just
> based just on logic, we wouldn't require the MIB definitions to always get
> the same be
Hi Bill,
Your point is valid, but I always had the impression that the iid always
comes down to the last numeric value in the complete OID. That way, just
based just on logic, we wouldn't require the MIB definitions to always get
the same behaviour just based on the OID.
Even on IP-MIB, where the
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Eduardo Bragatto
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just started experimenting with the Python bindings and I noticed a
> behaviour that looks like a bug when I’m using snmpwalk().
>
> This is under Net-SNMP 5.5.2 on CentOS 6, 64 bits and python 2.7.
>
> First I’ll show an exampl
