Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-25 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:14:59 +0530 Sridhar wrote: SS> Thanks for the patch. It is working fine with 80 interfaces, I am SS> required to specify the list of valid columns. Great, I've applied it for the 5.2.3 and 5.3 releases. -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be d

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-25 Thread Sridhar S
Hi, Thanks for the patch. It is working fine with 80 interfaces, I am required to specify the list of valid columns. SrIdhar On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:07:25 -0400, "Robert Story" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:49:32 +0530 Sridhar wrote: > SS> RS> Nope. What you've done with vali

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-22 Thread Robert Story
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:49:32 +0530 Sridhar wrote: SS> RS> Nope. What you've done with valid columns would work just fine, *if* SS> RS> the iterator helper used that data. Unfortunately, it does not. SS> SS> OK. In any way, can I get the column under query in the SS> ifXTable_get_first_data_point (

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-22 Thread Dave Shield
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:09, Robert Story wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:53:52 +0100 Dave wrote: > DS> Another possibility would be to have a flag to indicate whether or > DS> not to use ASN_PRIV_RETRY, or move on internally - perhaps set by > DS> the main table helper itself when there was only a

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-22 Thread Robert Story
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:53:52 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 02:15, Robert Story wrote: DS> > Nope. What you've done with valid columns would work just fine, *if* the DS> > iterator helper used that data. Unfortunately, it does not. DS> DS> what about having the iterator helper take

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-22 Thread Dave Shield
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 02:15, Robert Story wrote: > Nope. What you've done with valid columns would work just fine, *if* the > iterator helper used that data. Unfortunately, it does not. > > You get some benefit from the table helper, which does use it. A get-next > request for an invalid column wi

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-22 Thread Sridhar S
Hi, RS> Nope. What you've done with valid columns would work just fine, *if* the RS> iterator helper used that data. Unfortunately, it does not. OK. In any way, can I get the column under query in the ifXTable_get_first_data_point () and ifXTable_get_next_data_point () functions ?? If the column

Re: Processing unsupported objects

2005-04-21 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:48:37 +0530 Sridhar wrote: SS> In our setup we don't have the support for the ifHC* objects of SS> ifXTable. When ifXTable is queried from the manager values are not SS> returned for ifHC* objects. As I observed after receiving the value for SS> ifOutBroadcastPkts; there is s