2009/3/5 McGowen, Wendy :
> So since this is a single indexed table, the vmName would be the last
> index, making .118.109.49 acceptable. Plus I've defined it with IMPLIED
> (although is that really necessary?):
No - it's not necessary.
Whether you use implicit or explicit string indexes is totall
riginal Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:20 PM
To: McGowen, Wendy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Trap question: OID for variable from a table
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> I haven't done anything
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> I haven't done anything with string indices
> yet, but it looks like I just have to convert each character in the
> string to its ASCII equivalent (for example, "vm1" would be .118.109.49,
> correct?).
Perhaps.
It depends on whether the index is IMPLIED or not.
correct?). Easy peasy!
Thanks Dave!!
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:03 AM
To: McGowen, Wendy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Trap question: OID for variable from a table
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a net-snmp agent with authentication and cipher support.
I've compiled the openssl for my target and gave the directory to the
"--with-openssl=dir".
Here's an example:
Make openssl ---> ...openssl/include/openssl/*.h
---> ...openssl/lib/*.a
Configu
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> Do I have to include the index
> value in the OID for the vmName object in the trap
I believe so, yes.
>From RFC 2578:
8.1. Mapping of the OBJECTS clause
The OBJECTS clause, which need not be present, defines an ordered
sequence of MIB obje
