Re: WriteMethod function

2009-05-29 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du vendredi 29 mai 2009, vers 09:41, Dave Shield disait : > I would strongly suggest that you don't waste your time on the > old UCD way of doing things. The newer handlers are much > much more powerful. You really want to be using those instead. Unfortunat

Re: WriteMethod function

2009-05-29 Thread Dave Shield
2009/5/28 Vincent Bernat : > oldadmin_status  seems inaccurate  to me.  ACTION will  be  executed for > column 5 first  then for column 6 and the  only value of oldadmin_status > we have saved would be the second one, right? Correct. Remember that you are looking at the *old* implementation of the

Re: WriteMethod function

2009-05-28 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hi! I have read a bit NetSNMP sources and I think I have found some interesting bits to answer myself. > BTW, why is there a lookup before each action? I mean, the workflow is: > var_atEntry lookups the entry and sets write_method. > write_arp is called with action == RESERVE1 > var_atE