Re: Table entries indexing

2013-01-24 Thread Mishustin Kirill
24.01.2013 14:42, Dave Shield wrote: > It's not strictly *required*, but it is definitely strongly recommended. >> From RFC 2578, section 7.7: > > Dave > Thank you, Dave. -- Best regards, Kirill Mishustin -

Re: Table entries indexing

2013-01-24 Thread Dave Shield
On 24 January 2013 04:53, Mishustin Kirill wrote: > I have noticed that most tables with integer index have first entry > with index = 1, and not 0. (ifTable, sysORTable ...) Why is that? > Is it required by SNMP standarts or it is just common practice? It's not strictly *required*, but i

Table entries indexing

2013-01-23 Thread Mishustin Kirill
Hello, all. I have noticed that most tables with integer index have first entry with index = 1, and not 0. (ifTable, sysORTable ...) Why is that? Is it required by SNMP standarts or it is just common practice? What should developers of new snmp tables do? Begin with 1 or with 0? Thanks in