2009/8/3 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
But I fail to see the need
to have separate buffers for each objects.
Remember that a single SNMP request may contain several different
MIB objects - possibly from different areas of the overall MIB tree.
If the agent attempted to
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:34:28 +0100
Subject: Re: ucd-snmp vs. net-snmp (foot print)
From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
To: jpu...@live.com
CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
2009/8/3 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
But I fail to see the need
to have separate buffers for each
2009/8/3 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
Given that in most environments, run-time size is not a significant concern,
using a separate buffer for each object feels to be a simpler, and more
(time-)efficient approach.
Also in embedded Linux, the executable size
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Dave Shieldd.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't really provide you with any significant implementation
experience of running the Net-SNMP agent on embedded systems. I keep
putting out a plea for those who have done this to report back,
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:43:34 +0100
Subject: Re: ucd-snmp vs. net-snmp (foot print)
From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
To: jpu...@live.com
CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
2009/7/30 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
Concerning MIB modules... Having looked at 4.2.x code base, I
2009/7/30 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
Concerning MIB modules... Having looked at 4.2.x code base, I got an
impression there is some code repetition in the agent implementations.
Almost certainly.
One of the things driving the 5.x handler mechanism was the recognition
that there was a lot of
Hello Dave,
Kind thanks for your reply. And sorry for late reply due to a travel.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:58:50 +0100
Subject: Re: ucd-snmp vs. net-snmp (foot print)
From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
To: jpu...@live.com
CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
2009/7/24 Juliana
Hello list,
I am working on ucd-snmp (version 4.2.6), extending a set of private company
MIBs. I have been told the foot-print of ucd-snmp is significantly lower than
that of newer 5.x.x series net-snmp - Is this true? If true, how big is the
difference, and what would it take to reduce
2009/7/24 Juliana Purjo jpu...@live.com:
I am working on ucd-snmp (version 4.2.6), extending a set of private company
MIBs. I have been told the foot-print of ucd-snmp is significantly lower
than that of newer 5.x.x series net-snmp - Is this true?
Probably.
There are a number of additional MIB
