I see USE_LIBWRAP is defined in ucd-snmp, but undefined in
net-snmp. Or at least it's defined in ucd-snmp-config.h,
but not in acconfig.h. Could my problem where I crash due
to hosts_ctl undefined be caused by using (or pointing to)
the wrong .so's?
I have a problem where libnetsnmpagent.so give
Running net-snmp-5.1.2.pre3 release.
When performing the following
$ mib2c etherStatsEntry
It looks like the two expected templates get
generated:
etherStatsEntry.c and
etherStatsEntry.h
However I then see the following:
running indent on etherStatsEntry.c
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (399
in snmpd.conf i have:
proc rpc.mountd 1 1
trapsess -Ci -c public -v 2c snmp
rouser trapsender noauth
agentSecName trapsender
monitor -r 10 -o prNames -o prErrMessage "process table" prErrorFlag != 0
the snmpd does not send trap then i stop the mountd daemon and check with
snmpwalk i see that snm
i've checked the tcp_wrappers issue but this did not help
the /etc/hosts.allow was empty but in /etc/hosts.deny i had (on both snmp and ha-rs1
hosts):
ALL : ALL EXCEPT 132.72.41. , 127.0.0.1
while snmp and ha-rs2 hosts are both in 132.72.41. segment
the weird thing is that conf did not work(may
Running net-snmp-5.1.2.pre3 release.
When performing the following
$ mib2c etherStatsEntry
It looks like the two expected templates get
generated:
etherStatsEntry.c and
etherStatsEntry.h
However I then see the following:
running indent on etherStatsEntry.c
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (39
Sorry for the delay in answering - been busy.
MR>I'm working on a solution to handle disk physical errors using SNMP
MR>traps. I've got net-snmp installed on all my servers and would like to
MR>set my agent to send traps to a management host whenever a disk is
MR>dealing with physical errors.
MR
# snmpd.conf (names changed to protect the guilty)
#
syslocation "There"
syscontact "Help desk"
sysservices 79
agentSecName foobar1z
rouser foobar1z
rocommunity sandy
trapsink foobar1z sandy
trap2sink foobar1z sandy
informsink foobar1z sandy
trapcommunity sandy
proc mdlogd
##
That did the trick! Now if I can figure out why that is the only MIB that
gives me a broken pipe when the traphandle is executed.
Mitch
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mitch Raful" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2
> UCD-SNMP version 4.2.6 <=== THIS MAY BE MY PROBLEM!!! NOT POINTING
TO
> THE RIGHT VERSION OF SNMPD. I'LL TRY
>FIGURING WHY THAT IS AND REPORT BACK.
pointing to the newer 5.0.8 fixed my problems... thanks for lending a
k
(pls forgive me if this mail arrives doubled)
Hi all.
I have couple of HP (CPQ?) Proliant boxes, and am happily
running on the Debian Linux.
HP provides couple of SNMP agents for linux for the hardware
monitoring.
However, they are Providing only for RedHat and the like.
I downloaded their so
> What does it mean when I don't get many fd's from the snmp_select_info()
> call? Lately, the count is not higher than 2, and I cannot process SNMP
> requests. I've seen when the count is 3 or 4, I am able to process
> requests. Any ideas?
Maybe the select is not the problem, looking at the ou
> When attemptig to load the GENERAL_TRAPS mib the following shows up in =
> the output:
>
> Unlinked OID in CISCOTRAP-MIB: snmp# ::= { snmp 0 }
> Undefined identifier: snmp near line 74 of
> /usr/share/snmp/mibs/CISCO-GENERAL-TRAPS.my
Try tweaking the CISCO-GENERAL-TRAPS.my file to add t
When attemptig to load the GENERAL_TRAPS mib the
following shows up in the output:
Unlinked OID in CISCOTRAP-MIB: snmp# ::= { snmp 0
}Undefined identifier: snmp near line 74 of
/usr/share/snmp/mibs/CISCO-GENERAL-TRAPS.my
Any ideas why this does not load. I believe
SNMPV2-MIB loads prior
That fixed the problem easily.
Thanks a lot Dave!
MJ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 20, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Mijeong Seo
Cc: Net-snmp-users
Subject: Re: Bind Exception - snmptrapd
> No. What my trap generator does is to generate traps only when
> No. What my trap generator does is to generate traps only when
> certain condition occurs.
Fair enough - that makes perfect sense.
> This generator uses JoeSNMP Java library and actually it opens
> port 162 to send traps.
But that doesn't!
Why do you want to use a registered *listening* port (
No. What my trap generator does is to generate traps only when certain condition
occurs.
This generator uses JoeSNMP Java library and actually it opens port 162 to send traps.
Now I understand why it shouldn't work but is there any walk-around to have both
snmptrapd and external trap generator ru
Are French or Belgian ? ;-) Is the Emanate agent you
speak of part of HP/UX ? SNMP Research do have some
expensive products. What does your sub agent do ?
--- Leleu Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm a french young diplomed, and I'm on a society
> that has developped an
> snmp s
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 12:21, Dave Shield wrote:
> > OK, this is where I found that the file that the Debian package
> > provided for me and the FAQ and other documentation did not
> > seem to be talking about the same thing.
>
> Sort of.
> The Debian package is using the individual access control
Well, for now I got around it being executed twice by moving the
snmptrapd.conf file to /etc and then specifying the new location when
launching snmptrapd:
/usr/local/sbin/snmptrapd -OS -c /etc/snmptrapd.conf -Ls0
Since /etc isn't part of the default search path, it only finds it with
the -c o
Here are the results from sending the trap when running snmptrapd -d:
Jul 20 08:11:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] snmptrapd[15035]: [ID 702911 daemon.info]
Starting snmptrapd 5.1.1
Jul 20 08:12:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] snmptrapd[15035]: [ID 702911 daemon.debug]
Jul 20 08:12:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 54 by
Hi all,
For the needs of my company I am creating an experimental MIB file. I would
like to ask you if it is possible to use snmpget to retreive a whole file
(e.g. log file) from the agent.
Thanks in advance,
Mike
---
This SF.Net email is sp
> OK, this is where I found that the file that the Debian package
> provided for me and the FAQ and other documentation did not
> seem to be talking about the same thing.
Sort of.
The Debian package is using the individual access control directives,
that are described in the very next FAQ entry:
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 10:18, Dave Shield wrote:
> > I went through the /etc/snmp/snmpd,conf file and filled in the
> > bits that it indicated for basic operations (or so I thought).
>
> But what did you change?
> In particular, what access control settings do you now have?
>
> See the FAQ entry:
> I went through the /etc/snmp/snmpd,conf file and filled in the
> bits that it indicated for basic operations (or so I thought).
But what did you change?
In particular, what access control settings do you now have?
See the FAQ entry:
How do I configure access control?
>
I have recently installed the Debian (unstable) package for net-snmp, and
I went through the /etc/snmp/snmpd,conf file and filled in the bits that
it indicated for basic operations (or so I thought). But when I use snmpwalk
to inspect the tree all retrieve is the system object, and although it lis
Hello.
I'm a french young
diplomed, and I'm on a society that has developped an snmp sub agent using
UCD.
It work great with
the UCD master agent.
The problem is that
some client have an Emanate (www.snmp.com) Master
Agent and it appear it's not compatible with
the UCD framework. (and
> I'd like to send an SNMP trap from my application,
> with multiple parameters along with it.
>
> Does the MIB standards support this?
Yes.
> If the MIB standards support this, does net-snmp support this?
Yes.
> For exmaple, if I design a trap in my MIB for detecting large file sizes.
>
> When I perform
>
> snmpset -c public -v 2c localhost
> NET-SNMP-TUTORIAL-MIB::nstAgentSubagentObject.0 = 5 I get the following
> error
>
> Error in packet.
> Reason: notWritable (that object does not support modification)
How have you configured the access control for the agent?
Can you succ
> It seems that any script that I put in a traphandle line in the
> snmptrapd.conf file gets called twice when I send a trap to test it.
The two most likely causes that spring to mind are either the trap
is being received twice, or the config file is being read in twice.
Try running
snm
> Without snmptrapd running, my java trap generator works fine but it
> produces java.net.BindException with snmptrapd. I guess snmptrapd
> and my app can't use the same port.
>
> Could you give me a hint how I could make work both snmptrapd and
> my trap generator using the same 162 port?
Is y
> 1. In the code produced by mib2c using the old-api.conf file includes...
> ANONYMOUS
> #4:
> What do the two lines mean
No idea - they look completely bogus to me.
> 2. It would be nice to have a short example of the replacement code
> for :
> VAR = VALUE
See the various (old-st
31 matches
Mail list logo
