dom? I didn't notice such logic in
the code. Are there other error scenarios that would lead to random format
engineIDs?
Below are Wireshark trace snippets showing the same controller with a random
engineID then the intended, MAC-based one.
Thanks in advance.
Gary Dunlap
Frame 12
net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 6:03 PM
To: Gary Dunlap
Cc: Wes Hardaker; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: SNMPv3 EngineID Changed to Random Format?
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:20:56 -0600, Gary Dunlap
>>>>> said:
GD> I did notice in experimen
From: Gary Dunlap
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 2:03 PM
To: 'Brian Jones'
Cc: '-snmp-us...@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: net-snmp security conundrum
Are you talking about snmpd? I just edit/recreate snmpd.conf to match the
users defined in the GUI, then give snmpd
itely be interested in knowing that.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Jones [mailto:babe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:22 PM
To: Gary Dunlap
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: net-snmp security conundrum
So If I'm sitting on your network somewhere
nity public
engineIDType 3
From: Brian Jones [mailto:babe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Gary Dunlap
Cc: -snmp-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: net-snmp security conundrum
How do you handle the case of a user created via snmp from a remote station?
In this ca
neID and an apparent engine ID length of 0.
I do have an engineID, generated by "engineIDType 3" and present in
/var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf. Does the engineIDType statement need to be first or
something?
Thanks.
Gary
Gary Dunlap
Dot Hi
snmp/snmpd.conf or
"user-accessible" /cfg/etc/config/snmpd.conf file is updated. So new traps get
sent with the original authentication protocols.
Thanks in advance for your advice. This is version 5.7.1 on Linux.
Gary
Gary Dunlap
Dot Hill Systems
1351 S Sunset St
Longmont, CO
To paraphrase this, and Suresh's original message, are you saying that sending
a SIGHUP signal to re-read the .conf file is no longer supported for SNMPv3
users definitions? "No longer" meaning version 5.7.1.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
configure step. Since
that didn’t work, I commented out the call to log_notification() in the file
snmpNotifyTable.c. That worked.
Fwiw—there’s probably a more accepted way to solve this.
Gary Dunlap
Dot Hill Systems
1351 S Sunset St
Longmont, CO 80501-6533
303-845-3277
From: Michi M
Hi. I'm having trouble with some of the SNMPv3 traps sent by snmpd being
rejected, and I think it's because of the SNMPv3 replay protection mechanism.
It looks like when some event causes a reconfigure of snmpd, then maybe
registered callbacks are run. One of these may be engineBoots_conf().
callback so it’s not
easy to connect the dots.
Thanks for responding on this.
Gary
From: Bill Fenner [mailto:fen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 4:19 PM
To: Gary Dunlap
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net; net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: SNMPv3 Trap Question
11 matches
Mail list logo