Re: [NetBehaviour] jwm-art.death

2020-09-22 Thread Ruth Catlow via NetBehaviour
This is hilarious! On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, 21:03 James Morris, wrote: > > I suppose. By responding you've automatically your name is automatically > added to the script, by hand. My hand. However, due to your attitude to > winning I've put a marker next to your name. > > Cheers > > James. > > > >

Re: [NetBehaviour] jwm-art.death

2020-09-22 Thread James Morris
I suppose. By responding you've automatically your name is automatically added to the script, by hand. My hand. However, due to your attitude to winning I've put a marker next to your name. Cheers James. On 22/09/2020 21:01, Bjørn Magnhildøen via NetBehaviour wrote: hi james, can you

Re: [NetBehaviour] jwm-art.death

2020-09-22 Thread Bjørn Magnhildøen via NetBehaviour
hi james, can you put me in as a loser? i'd like to be part of it, i've enjoyed your website over time. maybe at the bottom, outside the count? best wishes, bjørn On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:39 PM James Morris wrote: > RF (here my abbreviation for "random function") holds a random numeric >

Re: [NetBehaviour] jwm-art.death

2020-09-22 Thread James Morris
RF (here my abbreviation for "random function") holds a random numeric value, currently fixed at 2020. If it wasn't fixed I'd use the alternative suggested in the comment, being the value of nanoseconds from system time. It's fixed because there are only three entrants, and two of them agree

Re: [NetBehaviour] jwm-art.death

2020-09-21 Thread Alan Sondheim
Surely Ruth all the time and forever! Best, Alan On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, James Morris wrote: winner selecting bash script attached. modifications welcome. winner currently fixed. web http://www.alansondheim.org/index.html cell 347-383-8552 current text http://www.alansondheim.org/xn.txt