catching up on these discussions. my mind has been offline for past month
or so, not taking in any new input.
stil getting my head around the term and its impact or method relating to
art.
my first thought was that I wanted to slow down too, so I enjoyed Ruth's
response to Annie's post below.
I
I worked at Edinburgh University until 2014. All staff were required to report,
under the Prevent program, any signs of radicalisation. Of course nobody ever
did. However, there was a well publicised case at Nottingham University a few
years ago when a PhD student borrowed a book on Al Qaeda
‘We immanentised the eschaton the day we went to Bangor…’
Simon,
May Road - May 2016
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
On 29/04/16 06:51 PM, erik zepka wrote:
>
> And when the questions, as both Ruth
> and Alan have effectively talked about, get to a realm of inhuman
> problematics, ecological, species-threatening, who should advise then?
Deodands:
You are extremely fortunate , Johannes, be working in the UK in a place it
hasn't reached -it is enshrined in law. I can only assume that someone at your
institution is resisting its implementation, or that it simply hasn't been
implemented there yet . Is poke earlier to a friend at South
On 29/04/16 06:59 AM, Pall Thayer wrote:
> I love those NASA posters and actually have one hanging on my wall!
I imagine ones with a similarly confident visual aesthetic and verbal
phrasing presenting a future in which full automation / post-capitalism
/ etc. have already happened (and were
On 29/04/16 06:42 AM, Alan Sondheim wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Rob Myers wrote:
>
>>
>> An ideal Accelerationist artwork would have been the Guerilla Girls'
>> proposal for a gallery to make its finances public as "the work" (the
>> gallery declined). It would have been a critical exposure
On 29/04/16 01:41 PM, Edward Picot wrote:
> The Royal College of Physicians have just announced their approval of
> e-cigarettes.
There was a controversy about them in the States recently -
Thank you so much for this. In the U.S. Islamophobia is at an all-time
high as you know, and here too it tends to be disguised except for Trump's
followers. With Trump etc., it's out in the open and reminds me of the
early Nazis, beer-hall putsch and all, very frightening. And frightening
gone world nowhere text
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung5.png
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung.mp4
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung4.png
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung3.png
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung2.png
http://www.alansondheim.org/mung1.png
mung
[2016/04/29 19:11] Flight Band: All
On 24/04/16 04:52 PM, Gretta Louw wrote:
> Death to the ludicrous, imperialist notion of 'mastery'!
>From the Manifesto:
"14. [...] Real democracy must be defined by its goal — collective
self-mastery. This is a project which must align politics with the
legacy of the Enlightenment, to the
dear all
never heard of it. when doing some fact checking, 'prevent' seems to have been
a government counter terrorist initiative,
for the past ten years, not entirely successful I read. But in the arts and
educational arenas where I work, it's not a factor nor has anyone
ever approached me to
and here's a slightly more populist ( but very good) take on it from,
bizarrely, Metro, the free London daily
paper:http://metro.co.uk/2016/04/01/professors-are-being-told-to-spy-on-their-students-heres-what-you-need-to-know-5789770/
cheersmichael
From: Alan Sondheim
It is a compulsory duty on all working in education in the UK to report to the
authorities concerns about vaguely defined signs of "radicalisation" ie. to spy
on their students.
It is clearly directed principally against Muslims but the examples I give in
my letter show that it is also open to
from what I gather, I agree; can you say more, for the non-British on the
list, exactly what Prevent is? racial profiling in schools?
thanks, Alan
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, ruth catlow wrote:
Hi Michael,
I appreciate your response to this process, and for highlighting so clearly
what is at
Hi Michael,
I appreciate your response to this process, and for highlighting so
clearly what is at stake. I no longer hold a permanent post in a Higher
Education institution but have been shocked to read in the press, and to
hear from those of my peers who do, about increasing pressure to
17 matches
Mail list logo
