criteria there would be no
>furtherfield and all the other bits that go along with it, it's a
>bit more complicated than that surely, which is why we are right now
>discussing this stuff!
>
>Stuart
>
>
>
>
>>--- Original Message Follows ---
>>From: &q
Tony,
Find all this interestingly humorous Karens remark was a quote by
Kathy Acker.
Initially wondered tongue in cheek which country was Kathy Acker referring
to...!
>> "One of the reasons I think the ultra right-wing has such power in this
>> country is that no on
Hello Karen.
And which country is Kathy Acker referring to?
Martin.
On 11 Feb 2010, at 22:12, karen blissett wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> That was a Kathy Acker quote...
>
> not my own.
>
> karen,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, martin mitchell
> wrote:
> Suggest.
rom: "Helen Pritchard"
>To:
>Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Crisis at the ICA: Ekow Eshun's Experiment in
> Deinstitutionalisation
>Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:07:09 +
>
>me too!
>thankyou for your reply Curt -
>Helen
>On 11 Feb 2010, at 18:43, ma
matin,
That's all correct. My comments were in response to my perception of
an oversimplification in your "suggestion…" to Karen.
The "ownership" we deal with here, "somewhere on the ethernet," is a
fragile space where there is a modicum of freedom tempered by the
broad yet shallow reach
Hi Martin,
That was a Kathy Acker quote...
not my own.
karen,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, martin mitchell wrote:
> Suggest. maybe you are looking in the wrong places.
>
> Martin.
>
> On 11 Feb 2010, at 18:52, karen blissett wrote:
>
> "One of the reasons I think the ultra righ
Tony.
Control, prejudice, ignorance and ideology are often used to 'control free
speech', one of the restricting tools used is idea 'ownership' which can take
on many slippery meanings like money, power and copyright, this email
conversation structure has ownership but who might be defined as t
Martin,
it's not my presumption that keeps you from being heard, but the
"ownership" of "free speech."
Tony
Antonio Dias:
http://antoniodiasadw.wordpress.com/
Horizons of Significance:
http://horizonsofsignificance.wordpress.com/
Fine Lines
http://finelinesamatterofdistinction.wordpress.c
But nobody owns my spoken words only your presumption.
Martin.
On 11 Feb 2010, at 19:12, Antonio Dias wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Outside of places like this list free speech equals money. That's what the
> Right has. Owning speech, what a thought!
>
> Tony
>
>
> Antonio Dias:
> http://a
Martin,
Outside of places like this list free speech equals money. That's
what the Right has. Owning speech, what a thought!
Tony
Antonio Dias:
http://antoniodiasadw.wordpress.com/
Horizons of Significance:
http://horizonsofsignificance.wordpress.com/
Fine Lines
http://finelinesamattero
Suggest. maybe you are looking in the wrong places.
Martin.
On 11 Feb 2010, at 18:52, karen blissett wrote:
> "One of the reasons I think the ultra right-wing has such power in this
> country is that no one talks out."
> Kathy Acker. ___
>
me too!
thankyou for your reply Curt -
Helen
On 11 Feb 2010, at 18:43, marc garrett wrote:
> I like that also...
>
> marc
>> Curt,
>>
>> Beautiful!
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> *Antonio Dias:*
>> http://antoniodiasadw.wordpress.com/
>>
>> *Horizons of Significance:*
>> http://horizonsofsignificance.wordpre
"One of the reasons I think the ultra right-wing has such power in this
country is that no one talks out."
Kathy Acker.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
I like that also...
marc
> Curt,
>
> Beautiful!
>
> Tony
>
>
> *Antonio Dias:*
> http://antoniodiasadw.wordpress.com/
>
> *Horizons of Significance:*
> http://horizonsofsignificance.wordpress.com/
> *
> *
> *Fine Lines*
> http://finelinesamatterofdistinction.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2010, a
Curt,
Beautiful!
Tony
Antonio Dias:
http://antoniodiasadw.wordpress.com/
Horizons of Significance:
http://horizonsofsignificance.wordpress.com/
Fine Lines
http://finelinesamatterofdistinction.wordpress.com
On Feb 11, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Curt Cloninger wrote:
Hi Helen (and all),
It seems t
Hi Helen (and all),
It seems to me that for an artist, the next tactical turn is to not
bother about the next tactical turn (don't bother to make it; don't
bother to refuse to make it). The next move is to follow the topics,
interests, and concepts of one's own practice, however long they may
Thanks Mark.
To me the most insightful part is where Charlesworth explains how
overarching forces of capitalism are causing an arts institution to
sponsor work by artists critical of capitalism. The tactical artists
cary out their confined, parochial, micro-critiques of capitalism
under the au
17 matches
Mail list logo
