Re: [NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

On 05/05/16 10:46 PM, Kath O'Donnell wrote: > Serenity below sounds like IP VLAN address allocation? you manage your > allocated ranges assigned to you by an organization, which fit in with > the whole global IPv4/IPv6 range. IPv6 being the expanded range as IPv4 > is running out of spares. Yes,

Re: [NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

On 05/05/16 10:25 PM, Rob Myers wrote: > as it seems to be in Sellars Cavell, not Sellars. I will get all the names right in one of these... ___ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org

Re: [NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

Serenity below sounds like IP VLAN address allocation? you manage your allocated ranges assigned to you by an organization, which fit in with the whole global IPv4/IPv6 range. IPv6 being the expanded range as IPv4 is running out of spares. On 6 May 2016 at 15:25, Rob Myers

Re: [NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

On 04/05/16 12:18 PM, erik zepka wrote: > > Your point earlier about the problematic nature of normativity I think > can be approached via a notion of combining normativity with agency. > That is, if the Brandomian normativist is also a norm-creator > normativity becomes a rational construct

Re: [NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

Or create new separate or superseding norms. The revision of norms over time, and avoiding local contradictions between them, is a key part of the sources of epistemic accelerationism - Sellars, Brandom, etc. . - I like this a lot - I think somewhere between the fallible pragmaticism of Peirce

[NetBehaviour] Epistemic Accelerationism [Was Re: Accelerationism]

On 29/04/16 06:51 PM, erik zepka wrote: > > And when the questions, as both Ruth > and Alan have effectively talked about, get to a realm of inhuman > problematics, ecological, species-threatening, who should advise then? Deodands: