Re: (Re-)Structuring NetBSD user documentation

2012-10-04 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:16:50 + David Holland wrote: > Rather than tackle your points one by one, I'm going to try to write a > single response, to avoid getting the outline lost in a pile of > details. David, that was a tour de force. I've been wallowing in the doc bog for 10 years now, I co

Re: (Re-)Structuring NetBSD user documentation

2012-10-04 Thread David Holland
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:16:06AM +0200, Julian Djamil Fagir wrote: > Imho, currently NetBSD's documentation has, despite being great and better > than anybody else's, three major problems: > [snip] Rather than tackle your points one by one, I'm going to try to write a single response, to avoi