On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:25:47AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:53:58AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
INTERNAL ERROR: expandfile() failed to allocate a new block
Is there some free space on the filesystem ?
Yes, a lot:
# df -k /mail
/dev/raid0e 1908596366
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:08:55AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 08:24:33AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
The only way for software to cause this would be triple-fault AFAIK.
Or a watchdog ...
But maybe you should try to replace RAM too ...
I replaced RAM, and
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:49:30AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:55:57PM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
certainly strongly indicates that what you are seeing is bad memory.
Indeed. But I tried memtest on the machine. It has been running for 24 hours
now, test is not
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 08:24:33AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
The only way for software to cause this would be triple-fault AFAIK.
Or a watchdog ...
But maybe you should try to replace RAM too ...
That RAM crashes on i386 GENERIC, GENERIC with PAE enabled, but it seems to
be just stable with
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:27:15PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
A GENERIC/i386 won't see more than 4Gb anyway, and usually it's more
like 3Gb because 1Gb mapped to PCI memory space. GENERIC/i386 with PAE
should see the 8Gb but maybe it has not been tested as much as i386 or amd64.
Sure, but 3GB
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:31:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:27:15PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
A GENERIC/i386 won't see more than 4Gb anyway, and usually it's more
like 3Gb because 1Gb mapped to PCI memory space. GENERIC/i386 with PAE
should see the 8Gb but
I had a machine (a Dell Dimension 9200, I think) that showed 2Gb of RAM
(without PAE) with 4Gb or more of memory.
Thanks,
Jason M.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:31:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus
Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org wrote:
Yes, but depending on the hardware and BIOS, I can immagine that only 2GB can
be below the 2^32 limit, and the remaming above (eventually well above).
Splitting at 3Gb is more annoying, hardware-wise, than at 2Gb.
I wondered if it could be related
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 21:06:36 +0100
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
Manuel Bouyer bou...@antioche.eu.org wrote:
Yes, but depending on the hardware and BIOS, I can immagine that only 2GB
can
be below the 2^32 limit, and the remaming above (eventually well above).
Splitting at
