Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20140422232347.bc512c52.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, Frank Wille wrote: >Christos Zoulas wrote: > >>In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, >>Frank Wille wrote: >>>The disassembly shows that the CPU fails on executing the instruction >>>"lock cmpxchg...", which is only

Re: Cross-compiler

2014-04-22 Thread Greg Troxel
mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) writes: > However, it is possible to build packages natively and only defer the compiler > to a faster machine. See > > http://wiki.netbsd.org/tutorials/pkgsrc/cross_compile_distcc/ > > for a tutorial. I forgot about that page. I now remember looking at it

Re: Cross-compiler

2014-04-22 Thread Michael van Elst
itgee...@googlemail.com (IT geek 31) writes: >Hi, >I'm running NetBSD 5.2.2 on a few Cobalt Qubes and I think they're >fantastic. >However, when it comes to building packages from pkgsrc, they're not so >great... mainly due to their 200MHz processor. >Would it be possible to cross-compile for the

Re: Cross-compiler

2014-04-22 Thread Greg Troxel
IT geek 31 writes: > Hi, > > I'm running NetBSD 5.2.2 on a few Cobalt Qubes and I think they're > fantastic. > > However, when it comes to building packages from pkgsrc, they're not so > great... mainly due to their 200MHz processor. > > Would it be possible to cross-compile for the Qube archite

Cross-compiler

2014-04-22 Thread IT geek 31
Hi, I'm running NetBSD 5.2.2 on a few Cobalt Qubes and I think they're fantastic. However, when it comes to building packages from pkgsrc, they're not so great... mainly due to their 200MHz processor. Would it be possible to cross-compile for the Qube architecture on my NetBSD i386 box (which is

Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Frank Wille
Christos Zoulas wrote: >In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, >Frank Wille wrote: >>The disassembly shows that the CPU fails on executing the instruction >>"lock cmpxchg...", which is only available for Pentium CPUs and higher. >> >>Any idea what went wrong? Is it a general

Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Christos Zoulas wrote: >In article <69b2bf00-4bdb-4876-843e-cf0b9c5dc...@azeotrope.org>, >Dave Huang wrote: >> >>On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:43, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> >>> In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, >>> Frank Wille wrote: The disassembly shows th

Re: Counting packets?

2014-04-22 Thread sven falempin
http://www.benzedrine.cx/pfstat.html On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Paul Goyette wrote: > Is there a quick way (using pf?) to simply count packets/bytes that match > specific criteria, without modifying them in any way? > > My specific case is to count SMTP traffic stats... > > > -

update (-u) builds vs. copying read-only files

2014-04-22 Thread John D. Baker
While updating a build (unprivileged) that includes the "iso-image" target, I saw the following: [...] Copying /d0/build/current/DEST/macppc/usr/mdec/ofwboot.xcf to /d0/build/current/obj/macppc/distrib/macppc/cdroms/installcd/cdrom ... cp: /d0/build/current/obj/macppc/distrib/macppc/cdroms/insta

Counting packets?

2014-04-22 Thread Paul Goyette
Is there a quick way (using pf?) to simply count packets/bytes that match specific criteria, without modifying them in any way? My specific case is to count SMTP traffic stats... - | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint:

Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <69b2bf00-4bdb-4876-843e-cf0b9c5dc...@azeotrope.org>, Dave Huang wrote: > >On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:43, Christos Zoulas wrote: > >> In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, >> Frank Wille wrote: >>> The disassembly shows that the CPU fails on executing the instruction

Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Dave Huang
On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:43, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, > Frank Wille wrote: >> The disassembly shows that the CPU fails on executing the instruction >> "lock cmpxchg...", which is only available for Pentium CPUs and higher. >> >> Any idea

Re: named illegal instruction on i486

2014-04-22 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20140422025233.086696b3.fr...@phoenix.owl.de>, Frank Wille wrote: >Hi! > >I have some trouble with named(8) after having updated my Soekris Net-4501 >from 5.1.2 to 6.1.4. > >The Soekris is used as a router and has an AMD Elan SC (486-class) CPU. > >When launching the new named it runs