On July 5, 2014 4:14:35 AM EDT, James Leone that_isridicul...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was reading this thread:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2014/02/06/msg014023.html and
gave some thought about a framework in which to deliver NetBSD instant
gratification to the masses.
Click'n format
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 02:43:19PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
I quote myself here:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:05:53PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
TCP connection established.
Packet size 1k bytes: 114938 KByte/s Tx, 114816 KByte/s Rx.
Packet size 2k bytes: 114924 KByte/s Tx,
On Jul 6, 2014, at 17:39 , Matthias Scheler t...@zhadum.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 02:43:19PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
I quote myself here:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:05:53PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
TCP connection established.
Packet size 1k bytes: 114938 KByte/s
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 12:50:42PM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
That's what I should've said if I wanted to be helpful. On Linux I
suggest iperf (multiple threads) or multiple concurrent copies of
netperf. It takes more than one thread to saturate the link. Then after
you made sure that
I've set up veriexec to monitor a data directory (20GB) containing
documents, pictures, music, and other personal files. I've tested
veriexec at Strict level 1 and it is working as expected. The reason
I'm doing this is to see whether or not veriexec can be used to monitor
a data directory for
