Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
This isn't as cool as you might think because [you can't | it's too hard
to] resize raidframe disks.
Uhh, this limitation is *-BSD related?
Iirc, that was/is not the case on Linux…
With raidframe, the first 64 sectors are the raidframe header, so you
I have an odd situation. Here is an excerpt from my fstab:
/usr/pkg/etc/asterisk /usr/local/etc/asterisk nullrw
/VEX/etc/asterisk /usr/local/etc/asterisk union rw
/usr/local/var/asterisk/usr/local/etc/asterisk union rw
Basically I create an empty directory
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
This isn't as cool as you might think because [you can't | it's too hard
to] resize raidframe disks.
Uhh, this limitation is *-BSD related?
Not really *BSD, but that raidframe doeasn't have code to resize raid
partitions. You probably could implement that.
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
With raidframe, the first 64 sectors are the raidframe header, so you
can't do that.
I was reading the docs
(https://www.netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-rf.html#chap-rf-ex-raid1root)
where just that example is described, iow. converting single-disk install to
g...@atmarama.net (Gour) writes:
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
This isn't as cool as you might think because [you can't | it's too hard
to] resize raidframe disks.
Uhh, this limitation is *-BSD related?
Iirc, that was/is not the case on Linuxâ¦
Linux md can grow can resize and
On Jul 7, 12:56pm, 76nem...@gmx.ch (76nem...@gmx.ch) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: NetBSD 7.0_RC1
| Finally, I have had the time to play with the option -march=native
| on Linux. I was able to compile the kernel 4.07 with it
| and then to use the kernel.
|
| All the process has worked without any
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:27:41PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On Jul 2, 5:36pm, 76nem...@gmx.ch (76nem...@gmx.ch) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: NetBSD 7.0_RC1
| Yes that true. I have stopped to play with PIE since it does not work
currently.
| But I plan to use this parameter when I will
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
Of course it was even possible to simply convert from single disk setup to
raid-1 by adding 2nd disk to the array later.
With raidframe, the first 64 sectors are the raidframe header, so you
can't do that.
I was reading the docs
Thanks for your answers. Everything is now solved
even under NetBSD 5.1!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Dan LaBell dan4l-nos...@verizon.net wrote:
On Jun 27, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Hans dinsen-hansen wrote:
Dear list.
Thanks for all your mails. I sat he whole morning and
1) made a safety
