On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:36:59AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
> OpenBSD has done it. I've made the same code changes but I stopped
> just before committing because we have dozens of custom copies of disklabel
> code that would need to be adjusted and tested.
>
You also need to keep in mind
Hi.
On 2016/02/09 0:24, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Dear list,
I know that this question is not NetBSD specific per see, but I am aware that
some of you out there have implemented and used vxlan-like technologies to
extend networks at L2. Some have worked on it with rump [1].
$DAYJOB is currentl
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 03:08:04 + (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos
Zoulas) wrote:
> Ok, do a cvs update (which is what triggers it), wait a bit and then
> do the unmount.
I'm not quite sure about to what you refer. On a non-stuck client,
during 'cvs update' on the NFS server or even arbitra
In article ,
John D. Baker wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:19:59 + (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos
>Zoulas) wrote:
>
>> So the problem is when nfs unmounts. You should be able to reproduce
>> it
>
>> mount foo:/foo /foo
>> cd /foo
>> umount /foo
>
>> And now umount is stuck and neve
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:19:59 + (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos
Zoulas) wrote:
> So the problem is when nfs unmounts. You should be able to reproduce
> it
> mount foo:/foo /foo
> cd /foo
> umount /foo
> And now umount is stuck and never returns EBUSY. Is that true?
On the machine
In article ,
John D. Baker wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, John D. Baker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:43:38 + (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos
>> Zoulas) wrote:
>>
>> > Unfortunately looks like you'll have to reboot and redo the test to
>> > answer this.
>>
>> To make it unambiguous,
Folks,
I used to contribute to the wiki.netbsd.se site. I also used to
source/use several articles there for various tidbits and procedures. I
found the site very helpful / useful. IIRC, there was some controversy
over the whole thing. This page hints at some of that:
https://wiki.netbsd.or
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, John D. Baker wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:43:38 + (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos
> Zoulas) wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately looks like you'll have to reboot and redo the test to
> > answer this.
>
> To make it unambiguous, I'll definitely arrange to do this again.
O
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, the wise Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hmm... do you have wscons=YES in your rc.conf, and additional ttys enabled
in /etc/ttys?
With this I can switch to multiple "consoles", but these have a blue
background (like the SRM console, not black) and don't have a login
prompt. Just
Using a sata drive. Today I tried armbian on the board and averaged 60mb/s.
- Original Message -
From: Michael
To: Darren
Cc: NetBSD User Maillist
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: harddrive slow/ allwinner20
Hello,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:27:47 + (UTC)
Hello,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:27:47 + (UTC)
Darren wrote:
> Tested this harddrive on more than one system, it is good. Just for
> fun I tested another drive with a usb port with the same results. I
> am getting transfer speeds of approximately 20mb/s using dd.
So, you're using USB, not
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, the wise Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
Hmm... do you have wscons=YES in your rc.conf, and additional ttys
enabled in /etc/ttys?
Eric
With this I can switch to multiple "consoles", but these have a blue
background (like the SRM console, not black) and don't have a login
pro
12 matches
Mail list logo