I am using base X11 of NetBSD 8.0 BETA i386.
While typing on laptop keypad, thumbs inadvertently touch the
mouse-touchpad and simulate double tap. In a terminal it ends up selecting
part of the screen, and in graphical interfaces too many annoying things
happen.
What is the way to disable this?
On 06/12/17 15:46, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
[---]
> I'm thinking about reuploading block device image for each change. I
> noted in the past that people were trying to do the same with TrueCrypt,
> and they give up - it's good for one-time upload of something, but it's
> not usable in scenarios
On 12.06.2017 15:03, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 12.06.2017 14:45, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
You would need to push large part image of an
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 12.06.2017 14:45, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>
> >> You would need to push large part image of an encrypted volume for every
> >> change to files.
> >
>
On 12.06.2017 14:45, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>
>> You would need to push large part image of an encrypted volume for every
>> change to files.
>
> That doesn't make sense to me. Why would you need to push more blocks
> than
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
> You would need to push large part image of an encrypted volume for every
> change to files.
That doesn't make sense to me. Why would you need to push more blocks
than actually changed?
--
Thor Lancelot Simon
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:51:00AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 09:59:17PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:12:58PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > I have used cgd for remote encrypted backups in the past:
> > >
> > > - remote offers a
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 04:55:52 - (UTC), mlel...@serpens.de (Michael
van Elst) wrote:
> Currently best practice for such a RAID is:
>
> -> align the RAID partition(s) on each component to 4k
A given. That's all these components are going to do, so 0 % 8 == 0.
> -> use a stripe size of 64k
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:37:01AM +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> I don't think the BIOS does disk accesses. So the "clunky sounds" are
> caused by the drive itself. It's also likely that this is the normal
> state of operation, so while it may make irritating sounds, it won't
> damage
