Hi,
I am running 7.1.1 on x86. I update pkgsrc and pkg_rolling-replace tells me:
cairo build fails because it pulls in MesaLibs which fails:
checking for SHA1 implementation... libc
checking for LIBUDEV... no
checking for LIBDEVQ... no
Please specify at least one package name on the command
Date:Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:18:31 +
From:Chavdar Ivanov
Message-ID:
| Anyway, nothing so far explains Martin's results being just a tad below
| those of Linux and everyone
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, 12:30 Sad Clouds, wrote:
> Hello, a few comments on your tests:
>
> - Reading from /dev/urandom could be a bottleneck, depending on how that
> random data is generated. Best to avoid this, if you need random data, try
> to use a bench tool that
Hello, a few comments on your tests:
- Reading from /dev/urandom could be a bottleneck, depending on how that
random data is generated. Best to avoid this, if you need random data, try
to use a bench tool that can quickly generate dynamic random data.
- Writing to ZFS can give all sorts of
2018-03-20 00:05 időpontban m...@netbsd.org ezt írta:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:58:06PM +0100, Fekete Zolt?n wrote:
Any setting which influence the test and I didn't apply?
yes, need to figure out what to make GNU dd behave the same.
It has different defaults.
Ok, I installed a precompiled
Well, testing with a file of zeroes is not a very good benchmark - see the
result for OmniOS/CE below:
➜ xci dd if=/dev/zero of=out bs=100 count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
10 bytes transferred in 0.685792 secs (1458168149 bytes/sec)
So I decided to switch to
I ran my tests with our dd and also with /usr/pkg/gnu/bin/dd, supposedly
the same or similar enough to the one in Centos; there was no significant
difference between the two. The fastest figure came on the system disk when
it was attached to an IDE controller with ICH6 chipset. about 180MB/sec.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:44:44 +
Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> I managed to get mine to about 180MB/sec, host i/o cache didn't make
> much difference, but I switched to ICH9 chipset and ICH6 SATA
> controller... Hold on, I just realised my root device is on an IDE
> controller, not
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:17:33 +0100
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:06:44PM +, Sad Clouds wrote:
> > Hello, which virtual controller do you use in VirtualBox and do you
> > have "Use Host I/O Cache" selected on that controller? If yes, then
> > you need
I managed to get mine to about 180MB/sec, host i/o cache didn't make much
difference, but I switched to ICH9 chipset and ICH6 SATA controller... Hold
on, I just realised my root device is on an IDE controller, not SATA, which
must have been the default setting for NetBSD in VirtualBox. I'll check
10 matches
Mail list logo