Re: rcvar for locate.updatedb

2018-11-23 Thread Jaromír Doleček
Le sam. 24 nov. 2018 à 08:16, Robert Elz a écrit : > Aside from the inertia criteria, which is probably really what > it is, I'd have thought a better test than "critical" would be > "probably useful to the majority of users - particularly the > less knowledgable". I actually think it would make

Re: rcvar for locate.updatedb

2018-11-23 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:36:54 +0530 From:Mayuresh Message-ID: <20181124050654.GA26847@localhost> | The question is about the defaults. Except for critical services / | jobs I thought a general guideline is to explicitly enable things. I don't know what the

Re: rcvar for locate.updatedb

2018-11-23 Thread Mayuresh
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Whether it is important enough to run every week depends > upon your needs. That's why it can be configured. Thanks. The question is about the defaults. Except for critical services / jobs I thought a general guideline is to

rcvar for locate.updatedb

2018-11-23 Thread Mayuresh
Is there rcvar setting to skip the locate.updatedb weekly job? man rc.conf does not seem to have one. /etc/weekly checks this: if checkyesno rebuild_locatedb; then ... Seems this job is active by default. Is it considered that critical? Mayuresh

Re: Poor raidframe reconstruct performance on 8-stable

2018-11-23 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
Can you perhaps try interrupt count via intrctl? iirc someone complained about some interrupt storm coming from acpi. > Le 23 nov. 2018 à 21:15, Mike Pumford a écrit : > > > >> On 23/11/2018 20:01, Michael van Elst wrote: >> mpumf...@mudcovered.org.uk (Mike Pumford) writes: I'm seeing

Re: Poor raidframe reconstruct performance on 8-stable

2018-11-23 Thread Mike Pumford
On 23/11/2018 20:01, Michael van Elst wrote: mpumf...@mudcovered.org.uk (Mike Pumford) writes: I'm seeing a write speed of 7MB/s which means my 2TB reconstruct is going to take 72+hours! Last time I did it it took about 3 hours if I'm remembering correctly. Just updated this to a build

Re: Poor raidframe reconstruct performance on 8-stable

2018-11-23 Thread Michael van Elst
mpumf...@mudcovered.org.uk (Mike Pumford) writes: >> I'm seeing a write speed of 7MB/s which means my 2TB reconstruct is >> going to take 72+hours! Last time I did it it took about 3 hours if I'm >> remembering correctly. >Just updated this to a build from the 17th and there is no change. :(

Re: Poor raidframe reconstruct performance on 8-stable

2018-11-23 Thread Mike Pumford
On 23/11/2018 19:30, Mike Pumford wrote: Due to a disk failure I'm having to do a full raid1 reconstruct on one of my systems and the performance seems much slower than last time I did it on this system. I'm seeing a write speed of 7MB/s which means my 2TB reconstruct is going to take

Poor raidframe reconstruct performance on 8-stable

2018-11-23 Thread Mike Pumford
Due to a disk failure I'm having to do a full raid1 reconstruct on one of my systems and the performance seems much slower than last time I did it on this system. I'm seeing a write speed of 7MB/s which means my 2TB reconstruct is going to take 72+hours! Last time I did it it took about 3