On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:15:38 -0500
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I realize there are man pages, but it seems we could use a ZFS page in
> the wiki to orient people and answer some questions. Before I create
> one (with mostly a bunch of things marked as needing explanations),
> does anybody want to tell
Hello,
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:15:38 -0500
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I realize there are man pages, but it seems we could use a ZFS page in
> the wiki to orient people and answer some questions. Before I create
> one (with mostly a bunch of things marked as needing explanations), does
> anybody want
You mean something more recent/NetBSD specific/less Oracle tainted
than the original ZFS Administration Guide at
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26505_01/html/E37384/index.html
???
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 1:16 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I realize there are man pages, but it seems we could use a ZFS
I realize there are man pages, but it seems we could use a ZFS page in
the wiki to orient people and answer some questions. Before I create
one (with mostly a bunch of things marked as needing explanations), does
anybody want to tell me there is something like this already, or that I
shouldn't?
mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes:
>On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:07:24PM +0300, Dima Veselov wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> it may be very dumb to ask, but I have installed 9.0 on UEFI server with
>> soft-RAID and now I have ld0, wd0 and wd1 having same wedges. When
>> booting NetBSD find
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:07:24PM +0300, Dima Veselov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> it may be very dumb to ask, but I have installed 9.0 on UEFI server with
> soft-RAID and now I have ld0, wd0 and wd1 having same wedges. When
> booting NetBSD find wedges on wd0, then complain about same wedges
> on
Greetings,
it may be very dumb to ask, but I have installed 9.0 on UEFI server with
soft-RAID and now I have ld0, wd0 and wd1 having same wedges. When
booting NetBSD find wedges on wd0, then complain about same wedges
on wd1 and ld0. It won't boot, I think this happens because first wedges
are
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 12:02, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> ci4...@gmail.com (Chavdar Ivanov) writes:
>
> >> gdb points to spec_read:
> >>
> >> (gdb) target kvm netbsd.12.core
> >> 0x80224225 in cpu_reboot ()
> >> (gdb) bt
> >> #0 0x80224225 in cpu_reboot ()
> >> #1
ci4...@gmail.com (Chavdar Ivanov) writes:
>> gdb points to spec_read:
>>
>> (gdb) target kvm netbsd.12.core
>> 0x80224225 in cpu_reboot ()
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x80224225 in cpu_reboot ()
>> #1 0x809fde2f in kern_reboot ()
>> #2 0x80a40299 in vpanic ()
>> #3
ci4...@gmail.com (Chavdar Ivanov) writes:
>addr2line didn't return anything (most likely I was invoking it wrong,
>I don't know).
You need to use the debug kernel (the netbsd.gdb file).
>gdb points to spec_read:
When used with netbsd.gdb you get more information. If you haven't
built it, you
One more attempt rebuilding zfs.kmod with the patch; now the ccd
device comes as expected:
...
ccd0: Concatenating 1 components
ccd0: /dev/zvol/dsk/tank/testu (4194304 blocks)
ccd0: total 4194304 blocks
...
but istgt still panics the system in exactly the same way.
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 09:58,
As further information, this is the curious result of a `tcpdump -i nfe0
-v' run on NetBSD 9.0, in `no carrier' condition:
20:22:10.761749 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 52845, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto UDP (17), length 226)
192.168.1.30.vcom-tunnel > 224.0.0.7.vcom-tunnel: UDP, length 198
Hi all!
I tried to install NetBSD 9.0 on a machine with motherboard Asus M2N-MX
SE Plus. Its integrated NIC is (from `pcictl pci0 list')
NVIDIA nForce MCP61 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (miscellaneous bridge,
revision 0xa2)
which uses nfe(4) and atphy(4).
When I power on the system, the NIC
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 06:47, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:12:29PM +, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 20:41, Michael van Elst wrote:
> > > I've prepared a patch for -current that fixes this issue.
> > >
14 matches
Mail list logo
