On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:51:12 +0200
> tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> > I would have liked to test piping the processes just invoking wine
> > (for console programs) as a part of the pipe, not writing huge amount
> > of temporary data
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:15:22PM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:31:19 +0200
> tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has anybody managed to have a working version of Wine on NetBSD 8.0
> > amd64?
>
> Never tried it, so not really answering your question,
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:51:12 +0200
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> I would have liked to test piping the processes just invoking wine
> (for console programs) as a part of the pipe, not writing huge amount
> of temporary data being a huge win...
If you can get Wine to work reliably on NetBSD this
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:31:19 +0200
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anybody managed to have a working version of Wine on NetBSD 8.0
> amd64?
Never tried it, so not really answering your question, however wouldn't
it be easier to run a separate Windows VM for such binaries?
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:29:27AM +, r0ller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I can recall, it will work only on 9.0 if the GSoC project got
> merged. If not, then you shall try current. Here's the last report from the
> GSoC project:
>
>
Hi,
As far as I can recall, it will work only on 9.0 if the GSoC project got
merged. If not, then you shall try current. Here's the last report from the
GSoC project:
http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/porting_wine_to_amd64_on1
Best regards,
r0ller
Eredeti levél
Feladó:
